For that, I am truly grateful. I'll be sure to return the favor. Hey, I'm here to help "people" like you anyway I can.I'll be sure to avoid doing business with you.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
For that, I am truly grateful. I'll be sure to return the favor. Hey, I'm here to help "people" like you anyway I can.I'll be sure to avoid doing business with you.
I believe you are correct. I seem to recall Sal confirming this regarding some models, as well, here on BF.Although I cannot confirm it in any way, I suspect that Sanrenmu is Spyderco's Chinese manufacturer.
How long is the blade on that? Total length? I like the look of that
It looks like spyderco and zero tolerance had a terrible love child.
Instead, maybe not. However, there have been a few Sebenza owners who've posted here on BF that they have purchased Sanrenmu/Navy, *as well*.It's not like someone in the market for a $100 knife who wants top notch construction and supersteel is going to buy this instead.
Instead, maybe not. However, there have been a few Sebenza owners who've posted here on BF that they have purchased Sanrenmu/Navy, *as well*.
I have $100+ supersteel knives, and I purchase Sanrenmu/Navy, too.
Well, in my situation, sometimes I prefer carrying/using a much less expensive knife, depending on what's on my itinerary, rather than risk damaging and/or losing a higher end blade.I guess I don't understand that. No matter how cheap it is, it's too expensive if I'm never going to use it because I have something else that's better in every way...
Excellent point.... Nor would I lend one of my nice knives to someone who wants to pry staples out of plywood with it, or cut steel twist ties, etc. ...
I believe you may be correct, based on what I recall from the thread I mentioned with Sal's statement/post.If Navy and SRM are indeed the same company, chances are that 'spydie hole' was done with full permission from Spyderco.
And, *I* don't care, just so *you* know.![]()
I see your 'don't care' and raise you an 'I do care'. The circular hole in the Navy blade is just poor form and should not be supported.
If Navy and SRM are indeed the same company, chances are that 'spydie hole' was done with full permission from Spyderco.
It's a hole drilled in a knife... does someone get paid every time a thumb stud is put on a knife, or a flipper? nail nick?
Who cares![]()
None of those things are registered trademarks. The round opening hole is. This company is using the registered trademark of another company to cash in on that other company's brand recognition without permission or even acknowledging the trademark holder. And I care, just so you know.
And, *I* don't care, just so *you* know.![]()
:thumbdn::thumbdn:
I also care for the reasons yablanowitz stated.
I still don't care.![]()
I see your 'don't care' and raise you an 'I do care'. The circular hole in the Navy blade is just poor form and should not be supported.