Hi CO,
First, let me say it's a great little knife and is an ideal little pocket knife even though it's very small. It's not too small for my tastes and is one that I've wanted Spyderco to produce for years.
I'm just not completely happy with it's quality as compared to the dozens and dozens of Spydercos I've owned over the last 25 years. No, I wasn't comparing the bone scales to the pictures of the prototype. This particular example's bone scales
are wafer thin as I stated and you can almost see through them where they are mated to the bolsters. Not only that but the mating is rough on one end on both sides.
If you're going to use a natural material for scales and especially jigged bone, I much prefer an aesthetically pleasing swell in the middle of the scales unless it's a type such as abalone where it might not be possible.
As far as the serrations go, I can't positively tell you if they're similar to the Jester's as I haven't owned a Jester in several years and my memory fails me. If I had to venture a guess I would say no as I can't ever remember Spyderco serrations that didn't immediately "bite" into whatever you were cutting and believe me, these do not. I would have to try pretty hard just to cut myself with the serrations on this!
I also seem to remember reading somewhere that Spyderco had changed their serrations recently to a more rounded profile so they wouldn't dull as easily. I'll take the old style as they would almost cut by just looking at them!
Look, I'm not trying to talk anyone out of purchasing one of these little guys because it is a great little pocket knife. I'm saying that I was a little surprised at it's shortcomings in regular Spyder quality.
My example shows that there was some production time cut in it's manufacture. A little more time and attention to detail could have produced a true
GEM of a pocket knife!