I do NOT want to start a Strider thing here, but I would SINCERELY like to believe that this was not done to prevent people from taking these things apart.
Let us explore the logic in that decision. The typical Strider buyer appears to me to be the sort of guy that really supports the idea of insane hard use (or there are the other guys that put them in safes...but I think it is safe to say that there are predominantly 2 types of Strider buyers, and the ones sticking them in safes are not the ones jacking up pivots).
The ones that beat the crap out of their Striders are pretty accustomed to using whatever means they have available to get the job done, and they do not back down from challenges...right? Am I wrong so far?
This new pivot only poses a challenge that I think many moders will rise to (or destroy even worse than the chainring bolts on the old models)...therefore I would really like to believe that the move was made for a different reason.
...it is just my 2 cent conjecture and rationale for it.