- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Messages
- 1,375
Farmer:
You should have maintained your good habit of reading through all thread before answering. You can do so now, anyway.
Reading again my initial post and the subsequent ones you'll see that I didn't criticize, negatively or positively, neither SRJ nor Lake knives. A critic is somebody expressing an objective artistic judgment on a work of art.
I'll make an example to make it clearer:
"Use of extensive engraving on XXXX knives means subverting the piece's linear simplicity and such engraved pieces lose their maker's spirit to the engraver's one much like fine caviar taste would be completely drowned in hot sauce" is a critic judgemnt (DISCLAIMER: READ CAREFULLY! This it's made JUST TO BE AN EXAMPLE, it's NOT my opinion, or the opinion of anybody I know about an engraved knife, and I DON'T intend to get on endless, pointless discussion about it with people who don't even bother to read what I write!)
So, this is criticism.
What I said is "to me they have no soul. Do you have seen knives which elicit the same lack of response from you?"
You see?
Objective statement vs. subjective statement. I don't want to enter a debate on how much objective a critic should be, let's just say that, surely, no subjective statement can be held as critic, but just as an expression of the thought of the person who made it.
EVERYBODY:
I'd really appreciate any answer to the questions I asked above.
You should have maintained your good habit of reading through all thread before answering. You can do so now, anyway.
Reading again my initial post and the subsequent ones you'll see that I didn't criticize, negatively or positively, neither SRJ nor Lake knives. A critic is somebody expressing an objective artistic judgment on a work of art.
I'll make an example to make it clearer:
"Use of extensive engraving on XXXX knives means subverting the piece's linear simplicity and such engraved pieces lose their maker's spirit to the engraver's one much like fine caviar taste would be completely drowned in hot sauce" is a critic judgemnt (DISCLAIMER: READ CAREFULLY! This it's made JUST TO BE AN EXAMPLE, it's NOT my opinion, or the opinion of anybody I know about an engraved knife, and I DON'T intend to get on endless, pointless discussion about it with people who don't even bother to read what I write!)
So, this is criticism.
What I said is "to me they have no soul. Do you have seen knives which elicit the same lack of response from you?"
You see?
Objective statement vs. subjective statement. I don't want to enter a debate on how much objective a critic should be, let's just say that, surely, no subjective statement can be held as critic, but just as an expression of the thought of the person who made it.
EVERYBODY:
I'd really appreciate any answer to the questions I asked above.