Exactly the point I am making. People choose knives for image/impression....some don't want something "aesthetically neutered."
The opposite of this is not "Tacticool" by default. Would you consider a Spyderco Military tacticool? What about the endura? I don't. To me they are clean designs with nice lines that actually
look like they are comfortable and stable in the hand, and perform just as well (when you sand off the middle point of the endura handle that is!
).
Some knives we choose reinforce peoples' stereotypes against us.
Yes and no. If we chose one with skulls, and drops of red paint, or slogans like "
Molon Labe", "
Para Bellum", etc, then yes, those are definitely "statement" knives, just like wearing an article of clothing that has a slogan. You wouldn't wear a slogan if it was one you were entirely opposed to. "
Molon Labe" guy is, if not clearly itching for a fight, then at least responsible for knowing that his outward statement implies that much. I won't wear "Monster" energy drink branded clothing, for example, or anything that has foul language on it. Why? Because those things make explicit statements that are virtually impossible to disassociate from those
choosing to display them about their persons, and they are statements I disagree with. "Unleash the beast"? "I have no filter?" How about I "control my emotions", and "default to giving others the same respect I would ask, which includes not exposing them to things I find offensive or degrading".
While its great that someone helped someone with a knife...that hasn't helped the stereotypes.
Really? Separating this from the explicit statement point just made, if someone looks at the shape alone of the knife, and thinks "Oh it's just a weapon, and he is only carrying it to be seen as a hardcase",
even after he used it to potentially save a life, then I believe there is a clear disconnect from reality in the person's thinking who maintains that impression, despite the clearly altruistic act performed by the karambit user.
If I were in a gas station and wanted to buy a knife, and the only one they had was some red paint splattered used Spyderco UKPK, you can bet I would pass on it. If it was a G10 handled cheap plain jane Mtech karambit, I would be all over it. Because I do recognize that perceptions make a difference, and I do care what perceptions I make because I understand people respond according to perceptions, but I also have the ability and willingness to calmly explain the reasonable purpose behind a hawkbill blade,
before I have to use it around someone. On the other hand, I don't expect anyone to take me seriously or give me credibility if I try to "explain away" the violent imagery of a zombie knife.
I still have not seen the news story, or a pic of the knife, but these are just musings about perception, and our responsibility to give a good one. I might see it and think it is a stupid knife that should never have been carried, or made in the first place, or I might not. But I think we have that responsibility because we cannot predict how we will be received if we just exercise our "right to do whatever we want" (not an actual right I believe in!
), and why should we risk generating panic or fear in others, even if we know we mean no ill intent?