I'm sorry if I wasn't clear, Not2sharp. I have no idea whether the statistic posted above is accurate or not--sounds exaggerated to me--but I posted it to show that the anti-gun people see things like that on a regular basis and understandably want stronger controls as a result. IMO, calling them irrational is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. Perception often trumps reality, but the recent Sandy Hook Elementary School murders (among many others) were no illusion.
I feel strongly both ways

. I support our right to bear arms, but there are far too many nut cases out there who are armed to the teeth with high-capacity military firearms. Unfortunately, I don't think we'll be able to legislate our way out of this problem without creating a huge black market demand--the war on drugs and prohibition before it do/did nothing useful--and the NRA's dipshit "solutions" only exacerbate a bad situation. It's almost impossible to close Pandora's Box once that sucker is opened.
I am with you there, I strongly support the right to bear arms.
The statistic is nothing more than an estimated guess.
Until the ATF and CDC (which did research on gun related deaths, which included information regarding gun control) both are allowed to release or research gun related deaths (weapons used, calibers, ammunition spent, where, why how), most gun/death statistics are taken from anecdotal sources (newspapers, publishing, etc) and are not accurate. Many say gun control does nothing for a society in terms of violent crimes with firearms involved, but no one knows for sure since all factual knowledge has been tucked away under the Tiahrt amendment and an
additional budgetary amendment against the CDC, preventing it from researching ANYTHING regarding gun control.
Tiarht accomplished this by introducing legislation to cut funding to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (and the CDC) for releasing even aggregate statistics about, for example, assault rifles used in crimes.
The Tiahrt amendment was brought forth by Todd Tiahrt, and started/lobbied by the NRA.
The obvious reason behind this were impart by two legislations passed: The Automatic firearms ban, and the Assault rifle ban. When companies like Bushmaster (and others) realized they could sell the AR 15 variants by changing out everything except the barrel, they began to sell what they marketed as "assault rifles" to the public until the
Assault Rifle ban. The reason for this change in weapons manufacturers to deal with civilians is partly due to the decreased sales.
When anti-gun supporters gathered in Congress, they could easily provide statistics and factual information (provided by the ATF) regarding these "assault rifles", information which negated all arguments by the NRA and gun supporters.
In response, the NRA had Todd Tiarht slip in an amendment prohibiting ATF from publishing or releasing statistics. Later on the CDC conducted it's own research regarding gun deaths (same way the ATF did), and once again legislation was passed.
Rick,
So what does this leave us with? No way for either gun supporters, or anti gun supporters to have a civil, logic driven, factual, and adult conversation regarding gun control. NRA's plan all along.