- Joined
- Oct 31, 2003
- Messages
- 8,583
Well, Jerry has basically said as much, at least in terms of prying. I don't remember the exact threads offhand, but I do remember at least a couple where this idea came up. I do remember that when the bony ADs came out, there was some explicit language about the knives being slicers, not pryers. The other thread I'm remembering had to do with thickness and a rationale for not making one particular model too thin. Maybe someone else can help me out with a link.
Anyway, it's just common sense. If you want to snap a knife by putting your weight on it, you're going to have better luck with a thinner blade.
If I want a knife for supporting my weight or for digging a ditch, I'll go with the .320 stuff, or maybe a nice .340+ MOASH. If I want to slice tomatoes, maybe not so much...
All true but some want to see how INFI, and other steels, hold up in the same tests at the same thicknesses. For instance, could the Chris Reeve
knife that Noss recently tested hold up to the same abuse as the FFBM if it were as thick. I think not but that's where some of the haters take issue. At least that is how it seems.
Personally Noss's tests prove more than just the toughness of INFI but also the toughness of Jerry's designs.