I'm curious about two things-
1. I wonder if Ontario will replace the knife. In particular, would they replace it if they knew how it was broken (seeing that picture)?
2. Do the members here think that Ontario should replace the knife?
Even if a knife company says that their knife is suitable for splitting wood, isn't it only fair for them to place a limit on what constitutes "wood splitting?
If, for example, a person tries to split the frozen stump from a 100 year old oak tree by hammering on the knife with a baseball bat, some might call that "batonning", but should the knife maker be required to replace the knife when it breaks just because they said it was suitable for "wood splitting"?
I don't imagine Ontario or any other company can specifically explain exactly what constitutes acceptable "wood splitting" in their waranty. Are they suppose to address every type of wood, green or seasoned, frozen or unfrozen, the size of the piece of wood, whether or not there are knots in it, what an acceptable tool is to strike the knife with, from what angle the knife must be struck, etc, etc.
Personally, I'd say chaulk that knife up as a loss and look upon it as a learning experience. I wouldn't hold Ontario responsible.