Order of KAI Official Hang Out; Part Deux - It's Enrico Palazzo!

9blades said:
*sigh* who can tell me where we will turn?

image_zpse02406cb.jpg
Click to expand...

this is hilarious... that is all
 
Actually although the argument about the date of Creation being 6,000 years ago based on the notion that water consumed is water destroyed is silly that isn't the interpretation of Genesis that makes sense anyway. Ironically 7,000 years and 2,000,000,000 years are *both* correct. Think about it. Relativity says that there has to be some point of view in the universe where only 7 days passed between the Big Bang and the development of agriculture by man, because time passage is entirely relative to speed and point of view. We also don't know where that point of view would be, because the universe expands symmetrically so we can't run the machine in reverse and scope it out. So the point about the passage of time since Genesis is moot. Moses Maimonides solved this riddle about 800 years ago in *A Guide for the Perplexed* and current astrophysics has contributed very little that is unique to his argument. He even describes the Big Bang fairly accurately.

Dawkins, on the other hand, isn't worth the price of ink. See Gerald R. Schroeder for the resolution between modern physics and Genesis. And Schroeder tears Dawkins' arguments to ribbons all while dismissing conventional Creationism as fairly obviously naive.

Just sayin'.
 
Heyyyy everybody.

New Order member here. #0084

My name is Chuck. I'm from Duluth, MN - right at the nostril of Lake Superior.

I'm 29 years old, I work in bulk marine shipping industry. I have a heavy distaste for mustard and a hearty liking for pizza. Just wanted to say Hi before I unleash all of my profound and life changing nonsense on you all.

And Enrico Palazzo is one of my favorite umpires.
 
BTW, I don't want to get into an argument on this forum about "religion." You can read Dawkins, and Hitchens, and whoever you want to, I don't care. It's just that neither of those guys have everything sewed up. I find Schroeder pretty convincing, but I couldn't reproduce his arguments because I'm not a physicist. But then neither are Dawkins and Hitchens.
 
dishcore said:
Heyyyy everybody.

New Order member here. #0084

My name is Chuck. I'm from Duluth, MN - right at the nostril of Lake Superior.

I'm 29 years old, I work in bulk marine shipping industry. I have a heavy distaste for mustard and a hearty liking for pizza. Just wanted to say Hi before I unleash all of my profound and life changing nonsense on you all.

And Enrico Palazzo is one of my favorite umpires.
Click to expand...

Welcome sir. If you get the chance put your number in your sig for those who haven't seen you are a member yet.

Freewheeling, greenie, niner etc... a little religion talk here and there is ok but lets not get into it here. There is a subforum for that and I ask any further discussion gets taken there. Thanks for your understanding gents.
 
dishcore said:
Heyyyy everybody.

New Order member here. #0084

My name is Chuck. I'm from Duluth, MN - right at the nostril of Lake Superior.

I'm 29 years old, I work in bulk marine shipping industry. I have a heavy distaste for mustard and a hearty liking for pizza. Just wanted to say Hi before I unleash all of my profound and life changing nonsense on you all.

And Enrico Palazzo is one of my favorite umpires.
Click to expand...

get out! get out right now!




LOLJK whats up chuck
 
I'm in! I'm gettin my KAI on!

I'm gonna try my hand at slapping together a sig line so I can be fancy like ya'll.
 
dishcore said:
Heyyyy everybody.

New Order member here. #0084

My name is Chuck. I'm from Duluth, MN - right at the nostril of Lake Superior.

I'm 29 years old, I work in bulk marine shipping industry. I have a heavy distaste for mustard and a hearty liking for pizza. Just wanted to say Hi before I unleash all of my profound and life changing nonsense on you all.

And Enrico Palazzo is one of my favorite umpires.
Click to expand...

Hi. How do you feel about tomato pie?
 
flarp said:
Not sure if whoever wrote that intended it as satire or an attempt at logic. Lol if it was the former. Facepalm if the latter.
Click to expand...

It's hard to believe it was intended as anything other than a joke, but you never know. Sounds like it's from a Seinfeld routine. (But missing a punchline.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top