Awesome! Some extreme and serious use talk!
When you reference a test in order to prove an assertion you most provide evidence to back it up. In other words, prove it!
Or, forget where you read this test. Reference it a bunch and not be able to show when or who did this test.
No doubt the Randall is a superb knife. I'm not even saying you are wrong in what you claim. But why did you take this silly thread in a serious direction? And, if you are going to do such a thing, be able to back up what you claim. At this point why not just claim this sort of stuff as your opinion? Nothing is wrong with having an opinion but you can't dress it up as empirically tested fact.