- Joined
- Nov 11, 2011
- Messages
- 1,398
Hi! This thread is inspired by a thought provoking critique of two of Nic's knives going now in Shop Talk.
Nic makes some pretty nice knives for a relative newbie. One of the responders on his thread though suggested he slow down and try for a "very good" or "perfect" knife, even if it took a year to do so. No doubt the same comments would apply to what I do and it has caused me to consider whether I am going about this the wrong way.
I started something over a year ago and have about 32 completed knives (ones that I count, that is). By my estimate, they are pretty good for a newbie and getting better. But they are not perfect. I would love to be able to make a perfect knife and perhaps some day I may come close. But what happened with me a year ago is that a hunting buddy liked a small skinner I made and wanted to buy it. That started my hobby on the road to becoming a small business which is making a number of folks around here happy, covering all my costs, and providing a modest profit besides. Mostly I work from orders so as soon as a knife is done it is gone. My customers think my knives are really good whereas the professionals on this forum would appropriately have a different perspective.
My question is, is it OK to do what I do - produce several knives a month for sale (and they all get sold) while trying to make each one better than the one which preceded it? Is there room in the craft for more than one approach? And just so there's no doubt about it, mediocrity is not a plan or goal here - I want my knives to be the very best I can possibly make but I know that may take a while to achieve.
Thoughts?
Nic makes some pretty nice knives for a relative newbie. One of the responders on his thread though suggested he slow down and try for a "very good" or "perfect" knife, even if it took a year to do so. No doubt the same comments would apply to what I do and it has caused me to consider whether I am going about this the wrong way.
I started something over a year ago and have about 32 completed knives (ones that I count, that is). By my estimate, they are pretty good for a newbie and getting better. But they are not perfect. I would love to be able to make a perfect knife and perhaps some day I may come close. But what happened with me a year ago is that a hunting buddy liked a small skinner I made and wanted to buy it. That started my hobby on the road to becoming a small business which is making a number of folks around here happy, covering all my costs, and providing a modest profit besides. Mostly I work from orders so as soon as a knife is done it is gone. My customers think my knives are really good whereas the professionals on this forum would appropriately have a different perspective.
My question is, is it OK to do what I do - produce several knives a month for sale (and they all get sold) while trying to make each one better than the one which preceded it? Is there room in the craft for more than one approach? And just so there's no doubt about it, mediocrity is not a plan or goal here - I want my knives to be the very best I can possibly make but I know that may take a while to achieve.
Thoughts?