- Joined
- May 7, 2012
- Messages
- 4,971
^^^Can you contest it? Get the news involved? That sounds exactly like you describe it. That's a total racket!! Entrapment or something....
Our Union went to the city about it but now the city is even worse. Sigh.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
^^^Can you contest it? Get the news involved? That sounds exactly like you describe it. That's a total racket!! Entrapment or something....
Just hire a bunch of kids to throw dog shit at the ticket inspectors and tow truck drivers. Works every time.Our Union went to the city about it but now the city is even worse. Sigh.
Ah, always around are the ill-informed chartmakers. The US is first governed by the Constitutional law, which allows the federal government to make or change law as and to the degree the Constitution permits. The US Constitution allows the federal government full authority to regulate all interstate commerce. However, it does not allow the federal government to regulate intrastate commerce, but it finds it's ways, wihin the confines of Constitutional language, to interpret such things as human rights, for instance. So in lots of situations, the Supreme Court will rule the interstate commerce clause to be applicable where the states argue it is not. Abortion is an example of a state right (I disagree) turned into a human right and therefore subject to the interstate commerce clause, allowing the US Congress to pass laws regulating it. Then the state comes in and, in reverse fashion, passes state law that eliminates funding for any abortions. But this is only an example of how the state can attempt to reverse the effect. Sorry, bad example, as most really problematic decisions end up decided by the Supreme Court.
This legal minimum drinking age thing is a perfect example of how the US Congress can, legally, manipulate the states. So I repeat, there is no federal law in America that sets a legal minimum drinking age. That is a state right.
To reinforce this thought..(if memory serves correctly) I believe there was a substantial amount of federal funding that was used as leverage to make state level governments comply. Also, there was a lot of political pressure based on lobbying.. I'd have to Google this for details..
So although it is widely accepted that the legal drinking age in the "U.S." is 21, implying federal law, its not true. However, the legal drinking age in every state is 21. It's like puzzle pieces making the picture complete. The end result is the same.
Here is my profile on ratebeer.com (I prefer to waste my time on here rather than there). From the aisles of Ralph's to Whole Foods to local breweries and festivals, I have sampled at least a thousand different beers over the years. The thing is that I don't really like beer. I still don't get it
.
I laughed at this, definitely worth a re-post:
"They have some "character" and extra shmoo (and are priced accordingly). But, they're beautiful in their own way. Kind of like Jo's dog Sadie. And, like Sadie, they have a dark soul and are mean (and perhaps a little gross). But, unlike Sadie, they're high performance and useful and I think they'll serve you well."
100%I'm just so sad that the LC pattern is being retired and I missed the last of tge D3V versions. I mean, I'll try for the 4Vs, but these swedged shmoos were something special.
Ah, that's what motivated you enough to get the number one spot!100%
The swedge made my panties wet...
"technical adjustment"Nice technical adjustments Luke!