http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...-KiDlAUDXqL9qQx6pb2wb4w&bvm=bv.48705608,d.aWc
I don't know if the above google-link will work, but according to unnotched impact testing, M390 absorbs MORE energy prior to fracture than Elmax when both are tempered above 60 Rc - Elmax can handle only ~35 J/cm2 vs M390's 40+. However, once the hardness falls below 60 Rc, M390's toughness drops below 30 J/cm2 while Elmax's increases above 40 to where M390's toughness was before.
In effect, M390 is tougher than Elmax if both are hardened above 60 Rc. HOWEVER (again), the difference in behavior between steels with only 5 - 10 J impact toughness is not likely to be noticed as impact thresholds from activity commonly fall either below both or above both. You are comparing the energies between 30 apples falling 1 meter to the ground and 40 apples - think you'd notice the difference? Now compare those 40 apples to
100 - approximate toughness of CPM-3V at 60 Rc via Charpy C-notch. The difference should be clear. BOTH M390 and Elmax are "brittle" in comparison to steels like 3V or shock steels like S7. NEITHER M390 or Elmax is a good choice where toughness is of primary concern... unless of course you don't anticipate threshold energy levels to exceed the tolerances of either, which can be accomplished by leaving the geometry a little bit thicker :thumbup: