Hearing about this has me thinking about what I remember of him. My interactions involving him were solely here, meaning in the CPK subforum, and sort of indirect, meaning he was likely commenting on something I was posting. The noteworthy thing which I’m only realizing now, in retrospect, is that he was engaging with me when he commented. It wasn’t usually making an offhand, open-ended comment. He was commenting, usually to a point, on something I had said. An actual dialogue, if you will, rather than what the usual forum format of ‘someone posting something so I post something so someone else posts something’.
He was interacting. An actual interaction. He demonstrated interest. More importantly, he was positive in that engagement.
I feel ashamed that I’m only realizing this now, with his passing. It has me considering how I post.
My uncle once said to me that he ‘doesn’t maintain casual relationships’. What he meant was that he doesn’t have time to waste with small talk, and that what we should be doing is engaging with one another meaningfully. I think Mike was doing just that.