While they may have (or have not), I am soured on the idea.
I don't pretend to know the ins and outs of that cobweb-esque patent law system. I just see a design being used by a company that is another companies bread and butter (SRM 763).
If you don't mind unscrupulous business behavior such as that, that's fine. Buying one knife but not another from them is still supporting them with patronage.
But to insist that
we should look the other way and purchase a companies product regardless is ridiculous.
You see value in what you get for your dollar, thats fine. I choose to see value in what my dollar supports.
You don't appreciate the knife, fine.
You haven't(?) bought one, fine.
You don't plan on buying one (?), fine.
But yet you insist on trying to persuade a thread worth of readers that a knife bought out of curiosity, for lending, a spare, (insert your reason here) isn't a just reason and we should support someone with a different moral compass instead?
No thank you.
---------
Can we please not further this conversation in this forum. This has been sidetracked long enough.
--------
Mods and OP: I apologize for the derail, I tried to keep as much politics out of my posts as possible and keep it focused on the knives and their parent companies.
-if you want me to delete these, let me know and they are gone.