Cliff - So now you're a mind reader too, and a predicter of human behavior (mine).
I can also change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
The only EDC knife I know you carried in S30V was (or is) a small Sebenza, which you altered considerably (I don't follow everything so you may have another).
Several, a half a dozen Spyderco's, a custom from Phil Wilson, a Rat Trap, and a Green Beret.
You also hit it pretty hard for chipping as I recall.
Yes, it fell apart drastically on plywood after the edge angle adjustment and was far less durable than the other knives of similar edge geometry even when those knives were used far heavier. It lost significant sections of the edge (visible) and I had to stop the cutting because the entire edge bevel was at risk of failure. It was the worst performance I had seen in awhile, compounded by the fact that it was being outperformed by knives about 1/10 of its price. The Green Beret was also not impressive, but that isn't as much S30V as the general design and the lower hardness of the steel and the associated problems that generates, especially with the high carbide steels.
Also, the two problem knives were sent to you precisely because they were problem knives.
Well yeah, they had problems and could not sharpen them and wanted someone to confirm that it wasn't simply their fault as one of them was a replacement for a defective blade.
This tends to focus the attention on problems.
Wilson also sent his South Fork to me as well as Glesser did with several Spyderco blades in S30V, all of which had generally positive reviews. As I have noted in the above, my personal experiences with the steel are generally positive, as it being a stainless steel as basically a high wear upgrade to VG-10. However it doesn't matter who collects the data, only its quality. This is no different than listening to the arguement and not the speaker. If you actually do bias your judgements on data that you collected then a simple extension of the same logic to everyone would make it obvious that progress could never be achieved.
-Cliff