- Joined
- Sep 9, 2003
- Messages
- 2,361
Kevin, That makes sense!
My question is, how big of a role does or should science play in bladesmithing? My concern is that the more emphasis bladesmiths put on science or metallurgy,… the more it appears as a pseudoscience to the public… the “science of bladesmithing“.
When I was studying metalsmithing in art school, the “basic metallurgy” was always taught and explained, but there was really more emphasis on creativity, innovation, originality, concept, design, execution or craftsmanship,… and things of that nature.
Metallurgy was taught more in terms of understanding the processes, techniques, methods and the implications and reasons thereof... Lengthy detailed discussions of metallurgy were usually avoided or left to the individuals who wanted to learn more on their own, as science just wasn’t the field of study in art school.
One huge difference in bladesmithing from other metal arts is heat treating. Getting "creative" in heat treating without a good grounding in what the heck is actually going on is exactly what has spawned all of the psuedoscience tripe we are plagued with. Not that every maker should have to embrace sound metallurgy. If I had my choice I would allow the makers to continue doing whatever they were doing, but all the collectors and potential buyers would have enough in-depth knowledge to spot the pseudoscience and be immune to the tall tale marketing.
Tim Z and I were just chuckling on the phone this morning about pseudoscience and how people get the wrong impression that we would want to see it all gone....wrong! The world is just too fun with these sideshows in them, and would be too boring without them. It would be fine if they could continue on as always but with the useful and responsible disclaimer -"For entertainment purposes only! Heck fortune telling is fun stuff until people take it seriously enough to have large ammounts of money bilked from them with it