- Joined
- Aug 26, 2005
- Messages
- 12
I'm new to the forum and relatively new to knife collecting. I've been buying knives that are well reviewed here and in the magazines, but are under $100 or so.
I recently decided to see what a higher end knife was like, and after reading all the great comments went for a Large Sebenza. Three hundred and whatever dollars later it arrived.
Uh, OK. The Sebenza is a nice knife. The blade opens and closes well. It has a nice feel to it. It seems to be very well made. The blade is bit rough and not highly polished.
The same day a Spyderco Byrd knife arrived (about $20). It is a nice knife. The blade opens and closes about as well as the Sebenza. It has a nice feel to it, but is heavier because it is steel. It seems to be very well made. The blade is highly polished.
When I compare the two I'm sure it is my inexperienced eye that is letting me down, but I just don't see much difference between them. I have a Buck Strider and a few other decent knives, so I compared them to the two new ones as well. The difference between all of these and a $10 cheapie is obvious: no blade play, edge evenly ground, consistent bevels, no flaws, etc.
What should I be looking at to tell the quality difference between these better knives?
I recently decided to see what a higher end knife was like, and after reading all the great comments went for a Large Sebenza. Three hundred and whatever dollars later it arrived.
Uh, OK. The Sebenza is a nice knife. The blade opens and closes well. It has a nice feel to it. It seems to be very well made. The blade is bit rough and not highly polished.
The same day a Spyderco Byrd knife arrived (about $20). It is a nice knife. The blade opens and closes about as well as the Sebenza. It has a nice feel to it, but is heavier because it is steel. It seems to be very well made. The blade is highly polished.
When I compare the two I'm sure it is my inexperienced eye that is letting me down, but I just don't see much difference between them. I have a Buck Strider and a few other decent knives, so I compared them to the two new ones as well. The difference between all of these and a $10 cheapie is obvious: no blade play, edge evenly ground, consistent bevels, no flaws, etc.
What should I be looking at to tell the quality difference between these better knives?