- Joined
- Jan 29, 2010
- Messages
- 9,845
Most all should stay away from the original issue, the Mods were clear that was put to bed.
I generally like to think we as a group can rise above "legal contracts" in so far as what an "I'll take it" etc means, there is a saying here "we are not playing for sheep stations" which means these are generally small beans. It should be that buyers and sellers follow the base etiquette of such things but if they don't then invoking "binding contract" is fairly lame. In the person to person transactions here the most important is what happens once $s have traded hands. I AM NOT saying that the repeat offenders of "I'll take it" and then silence should not be called out and the same with the one who list and remove and re-list there items over and over (when someone has claimed them), the variations on both are painful for all but should simply result in the seasoned marketplace warrior
placing them on ignore so as not to be tempted. No one's life, liberty or the like are at stake here.
I generally like to think we as a group can rise above "legal contracts" in so far as what an "I'll take it" etc means, there is a saying here "we are not playing for sheep stations" which means these are generally small beans. It should be that buyers and sellers follow the base etiquette of such things but if they don't then invoking "binding contract" is fairly lame. In the person to person transactions here the most important is what happens once $s have traded hands. I AM NOT saying that the repeat offenders of "I'll take it" and then silence should not be called out and the same with the one who list and remove and re-list there items over and over (when someone has claimed them), the variations on both are painful for all but should simply result in the seasoned marketplace warrior

Last edited: