Well, the purpose (which was clearly stated) was to allow me to grab more of the "meat" at the end of the handle than is allowed by the deep carry clip, and to put a clip on each side. The reason for the latter is that if I carry a firearm I want the knife in the left pocket, whereas otherwise I want it in the right. Finally, the ergonomics of the handle itself are a little thin so having two clips in symmetrical locations improves the ergonomics.
R.B. Fuller once said that if they'd tasked an industrial designer to design a ship what they'd end up with is a pile of garbage floating down the Hudson. I know all about Paul Klee et al and the origins of industrial design. It's a grandiose tragedy.
Or to put it another way, when the knife is in carry the only thing you see is the clip and a small bit of the knife so aesthetic considerations are of next to no importance compared to ergonomics. And when the knife is in use the clips are covered by the hand, so again it's irrelevant. The primary purpose of aesthetic design is to sell the knife in pictures, or more accurately to give you an image of what someone else wants so that you'll want it too. That is, on a simple but meaningful level it's to generate envy or mimetic desire. That's what marketing and advertising is all about. And since I have absolutely no interest in marketing this little treasure my only possible concern is the temporary one of pleasing you. And since in your case expressing your opinion trumps "aesthetics" you must be having fun. Mission accomplished!
Update: By "having fun" I mean the way athlete's foot is fun.