Anyone that's a Fanboy or Fangirl of the site, more power to you.
I'm happy you've had nothing but wonderful satisfactory experiences with said web site.
As I said several times, '"your individual mileage may vary".
I am not new to knifes or dealing with companies selling them whether online or brick and mortar.
As to the posts making assumptions as to the reality of the issue I personally experienced, feel free to assume, but please refrain from insinuating.
A "waved re-stocking fee" was never offered or stated period, a "we pay return shipping" was never offered or stated period.
Any "supposedly offered" refund/waved restocking fee/free return shipping would have been and is for me completely negated by what was first actually
told to me in text in in the email I received from ACK after first informing them that: "the lock is loose and has serious up and down loudly clicking play"... the response back in text was: "That's the way those locks are".
Not we are sorry we must have overlooked something, not "send it back for a refund", not "we'll wave the restock fee", not we'll pay for return shipping,
again.. the response in text was "That's the way those locks are" (lockback).
This is the reality of my "sour" experience, nothing "left out" period.
1. Knife shown had "excellent condition" clearly stated in the description of the desired knife, upon close inspection of the photo, the 'thumb stud' was CLEARLY missing/absent, when I asked ACK "do you or the consignee have it?"... the answer was: "no, we don't, nor does the consignee have it".
The asking price remained the same despite the fact an integral design part of the knife was missing/not included.
I then wrote to Ditmar Pohl, asked about obtaining a thumb stud for the knife, I was told: "no problem, I'll have one sent out to you no charge",
seven days later I received TWO thumb studs in the mail from Germany.
2. I then made an offer negotiating a lower price for the knife based on the missing integral part which was "not included" and initially not even disclosed.
(at that point not even knowing of the faulty lockup).
ACK contacted the consignee, consignee agreed to negotiated lower price based on missing thumb stud.... knife sold.
3. I received the knife, immediately discovered the ridiculously faulty/defective/loose/clicking lock up and immediately informed ACK (who obviously never checked the knife).
The very first response back in text was: "That's the way those locks are" not: "send it back to us for a refund" etc.
I then made a 15 second video holding the knife in my hand and clearly demonstrating the loose/faulty/clicking lockup, then sent the video to both ACK and to Ditmar Pohl who immediately did the right thing.
Which decision would have been more intelligent and wiser?:
1. Return the knife to ACK for the never offered "refund", "waved re-stocking fee" "we pay return shipping", as opposed to what was first told to me:
"That's the way those (lockback) locks are".
Or:
2. Return the knife I wanted to Ditmar Pohl and in return receive a brand new knife, lockup solid as a California Redwood tree (that was no longer being sold with D2 steel anywhere at the time) in a new pouch, with a dated month/year, signed certificate by Ditmar Pohl along with several P.F. patches?
The second more intelligent choice was made, end of story.