"Was it supposed to be a recurve?" This video killed me.
But all joking aside, I think Benchmade has to clamp down hard on the QC, unless it wants to go fall towards the rich man's CRKT - amazing designs, inconsistent quality, mass name recognition sales. The average consumer doesn't care about blade centering, symmetrical grinds and other nitty-gritty details, but the average consumers also aren't the ones shoving $500 for gold class Benchmades, which has a more significant Butterfly Tax. Let's face it, carbon fiber is more expensive than micarta, but at most $35/pair more. Benchmade, as a manufacturer, gets them much cheaper then we small makers do.
And it's super doable. The excuse that Benchmade has so many QC issues from sheer production volume doesn't hold water when you consider all of its competitors, especially OEM makers. I'm sure Reate/WE makes a comparable amount, but try finding the same amount of complaints for WE, Reate, Boo's Blades, Todd Beggs Steelcrafts, etc. If Chinese makers "don't count because of IP theft/labor/other justifications", then OEM makers like Technocut, Maserin, Moki, Seki-Cut, etc? I'm sure all of the OEM makers above have QC issues, but none at the scale of which Benchmade does - which you can confirm with a ten second Google/forum/Youtube search.
And yeah, Spyderco does have QC issues too, like for the
Lum Tanto here, or the Gayle Bradley Advocate + Loctite policy fiasco from last year - but Sal has proven to take care of things on the spot every-time.
The best policy for now is just to buy everything in person, or request pictures from dealers before you buy - for all knives. Anything above $150 at this point should be pretty perfect, so as knife knuts we should expect and enforce it.
Edit: Phone edited "Benchmade" to "Benchmark"