USAFSP said:
Or ask us to list what we would like to see.
I have been doing this for about ten years now and this was always a known aspect of the reviews, I have stated it clearly many times over, plus many of the reviews actually have such comments right in them, and many of the methods of evaluation are based on user feedback.
Plus if you read any amount of the posts I make it should be clear I am willing to look at the behavior of knives I have if someone asks about them, even if it is not specifically towards me. I have even done this multiple times in the past week alone.
You can make such suggests any time the review is in progress. In fact if I still have the knife and it is usable, you can make such suggestions after the review has been finished.
They are all periodically updated every couple of years with EDC comments anyway. The only real restriction is not to wait 1-2 years until the knife is too damaged or returned and then start complaining about scope of work.
That looks kind of lame anyway.
When I get a knife I usually post up a short overview like the Trident, M60, Manix, comments recently, and then they go into a long extended use evaluation.There is a section in the reviews page with reviews in progress, these hang out there for a long time until the review gets finished as my EDC rotation is a *LONG* time.
The only exception to this is unexpected breaks like on the Buck/Strider Solution where my brother broke it accidently chopping in hardwoods. He was supposed to carry it for at least a month before going heavy with it, but before that I had some other work planned. But these things happen from time to time, but still even with that, the review was public knowledge for a long time. I mentioned that I had that knife for review last year for example.
-Cliff