Since I know you own both this I think would be a good place to ask. I am torn between my next knife purchase a 4.1 or a RMD. If you could only have one which would you choose and why?
Give me a couple of days to take some comparison shots and write/record something detailed, but know that the GSO-5.1 is a closer cousin to the RMD, and I'll be doing a direct comparison of those when the 5.1's ship out. I specifically used the HRLM in this thread as a closer match. And I will say this now, I haven't had the GSO-4.1 long enough to decide between it and the HRLM.
The RMD has the same handle as the HRLM, superior in comfort and control over the GSO-4.1 as mentioned in this review. Honestly, that handle may be enough by itself to tip the scales in favor of the RMD (or HRLM) - it's just so easy to hold & control and fits my hand better than the GSO-4.1. I'll be modifying the handle of the GSO-4.1 I keep to see if i can improve the comfort. The RMD has a longer blade and enlarged choil for slightly more reach while still allowing a close choke-grip, clip-point for increased tip penetration (e.g. stabbing, drilling) with a comfortable thumb-ramp to allow added force in such use, it's thicker stock for an overall sturdier package, and SR101 steel has demonstrated impressive toughness in use.
But the RMD is half-again heavier than the GSO-4.1, mine came with a thick edge in the curve that required a LOT of hand-work to bring to an acceptable level of performance, the extra blade length means a larger profile than might be ideal in some environments, many dislike choils and the RMD's is a little higher up the blade than is ideal, the knife doesn't come with a sheath, uncoated blades are only available custom or secondary market and will rust if uncared for (as will the edge), and SR101 wear-resistance is likely far below CPM-3V or M390 or 20CV.
Sooo... would you rather have a lighter, more compact tool that is ready to go or a longer (heavier) tool with a more comfortable handle but may need work to improve its performance?
As a "combat" or "survival/camping" single tool (urban, woodland, wherever), I'd prefer the sturdier RMD for prying, penetration, longer reach, batonning, and better ergonomics in adverse conditions. The RMD can handle a lot of abuse and can be modified (with some re-profiling work or if you bother customer service about it when you order) into an excellent cutter. I carry mine in a cheap canvas sheath purchased from SYKCO for their 7" blades, modified for an excellent fit. The total price was less than the going price for a GSO-4.1. But for all other hunting, woodcraft, diving, etc. I think the lighter blade in the smaller package with the lower maintenance is a better fit and the GSO-4.1 comes ready for use with a sturdy and razor-sharp edge of premium steel and an excellent sheath, a higher level of performance out of the box.
Again, I'll do a direct comparison of the RMD to a GSO-5.1 once mine arrives. I anticipate the GSO-5.1 to be lighter and higher performing out of the box, but it was also more expensive than the RMD. I may be able to modify the RMD's edge profile to match the other's cutting ability (with a lot of work that may translate to it being a more expensive knife), whereas I'm still considering ways to modify the GSO handle to bring it close to the comfort afforded in the rats. Time will tell...