...Case in point: Yes, it is. It's called "easy penetration". Yes to what? Easy penetration of what? What is relevant about this weirdly phrased response? ...
Yes to this:
There is nothing about a Tanto blade shape that means it needs to be long....
Look, don't make this personal by going after my English, discrediting the opponent with non-related to the subject issues you have,
only means that you can't win the argument with facts and you are changing the subject, that's it. None of the people I'm communicating here have problem with my English,
if you pretend to be so smart you shouldn't to, and you should concentrate on things that people are pointing to, instead arguing.
I wasn't trying to bash you, I was sharing conclusion, pretty much obvious for others but not to you.
Case in point here is that you are failing to look at tantos as a weapons, therefore you are concentrating on properties that are common in blades designed for everyday tasks and tantos are not designed with this primary function in mind.
Penetration does not only mean penetrating barrier material, it also means penetrating deep enough for reaching vital organ. That's why originally those "Japanese" tantos, regardless of tip shape, were long enough for this purpose.
... Are you trying to say that longer blades penetrate better? They don't. Penetration is purely a function of tip shape and cross sectional surface area and blade volume. A 5' sword doesn't penetrate any better than the 2' sword with the exact shame shape.
..."What's a tanto good for?" Practically anything, since the term denotes so many different grinds.
Here is more confusion. Yes, technically, 5" blade will have more momentum because it weights more than 2" blade and will penetrate
deeper if both blades are accelerated with same speed.
Of course, 3" will not make noticeable difference, but the statement isn't correct.
Your statement is only correct if we are talking about penetrating barrier material, but this is not the only intended purpose of a blade designed as a weapon, it's also depth of penetration, so in this regard - yes, 5" blade will penetrate more/better than 2" blade.
And one more time "Yes": if longer blade (as the pictured two Williams's blades) have longer curve at the tanto tip, it will penetrate better/
easy in soft materials than tip with more blunt angle as the CQC7 and the Voyager's blades.
Going after the tip shape and "semantics" was already addressed in English better than I can do, I guess, but the evolution from the original, Japanese tanto tip to what is called "American" tanto and all such varieties make sense only if you are looking at it not as utility knife but as a weapon. The sharp point by the tip cuts better than the round belly, you are concentrating same power in less surface. It works great in
short blades as the once we use today, folders and so on.
In fact if you look at most common shape of the CS tantos for example, the hollow grind looks
exactly as a razor blade, hence it has the same hollow grind, but little bit thicker to accommodate the intended purpose of the blade.
So this part of the "american" tanto gives your weapon excellent slashing blade while when cutting with the sharp angle at the tip, the angle of it preserves the actual tip sharpness for use when needs to penetrate barrier material. It's a great design for a weapon, not for carving and skinning game.
The problem is the same as with every sharp weapon - the sharp edge/angle wears out quicker. I guess Japanese recognized this long time ago and they did the same what nowadays the Ferlach's engineers did with the lands of Glock barrel's bores - they rounded it, they artificially wore those sharp corners/edges/angles, prolonging the life of this part of the blade/lands . They sacrificed some of the cutting performance of the tip for wear resistance. The angle of the tip was pretty much the same so it did not affect the barrier penetrating performance.