Tempering talk

OK.
Thanks, Kevin, thanks Stacy.
Got it, for now.
Now, instead of two more questions, I have 20.
I'll wait 'till Ashokan.
 
Thank you Kevin for the great posts. It was my post that Stacy mentioned. As I was searching, @ approximately 11:30pm, I came across a post mentioning how important it was to let a blade cool completely to room temp before temper. Thanks to your excellent posts, I see the importance is simply to be past the Mf for the steel, right?

So ideally, you are trying to get as much austenite as you can in the start of the quench, then turn as much of that as possible into martensite as you get past the nose, and then relax the martensite by letting the carbon move slightly in the tempering process?

And this slight carbon movement creates tiny, stable carbides in a tough matrix?

Sorry for the many questions, but I am thrilled to have the chance to learn some of this the right way.
 
Stacy, I think I like your explanation better than mine, it seems clearer when I read them. One little thing I may add, since folks always interpret things farther than we mean, you can do anything you like above Ms, and even some slight adjustments below but serious deformation should be avoided as soon as the transformation begins. As that wave of tilting and shearing habit planes go shooting through the matrix things kind of go haywire with the ductile properties. If you had needle like structures shooting through your cells at the speed of sound, I doubt you would be up to any yoga exercises or being slapped around until it was done. From Ms to Mf gently guiding it straight is fine hammering to kinking is not cool.

I had some 3/16" 5160 rod that I played with once to see if I could tie it in a not after the quench was interrupted and before it fully hardened, I was only fast enough once to get a loose knot (kind of like a pretzel) before the transformation began and things got ugly.
 
...So ideally, you are trying to get as much austenite as you can in the start of the quench, then turn as much of that as possible into martensite as you get past the nose, and then relax the martensite by letting the carbon move slightly in the tempering process?

And this slight carbon movement creates tiny, stable carbides in a tough matrix?

Sorry for the many questions, but I am thrilled to have the chance to learn some of this the right way.

Well generally- yes. however there is a reason I continually harp on the idea that none of this is all that simple and can ever be handled with one or two simple recipes.

What you are shooting for when austenitizing is to get from .60% to .80% carbon into solution so that you can get maximum martensite hardness while leaving the extra carbon tied up in very fine and evenly distributed carbides, for excellent wear resistance. Beyond this more dissolved carbon will result in heavy amounts of embrittling plate martensite (don't worry about it too much as it would require another thread unto itself) and encourage retained austenite.

This is the ideal, but what gets in the way is the initial carbon content and the ammount of alloying elements that will grab onto carbon and not let go and this is why each steel has its own austenitizing temperature and the time required for it to work. Simply using a nonmagnetic for everything will get you in the ball park but will never get you any home-runs.

1080 or 1084 is mostly just carbon to get into solution so heating it to nonmagnetic for even a short time will yield pretty good results, however simply add some chromium and remove around .2% carbon and now you will need to go all the way to 1525F and hold it for some time in order to break the bonds with the chromium and dissolve the extra ferrite in order to get things all in solution and evenly mixed for the quench. If you get the solution you are looking for, then quench it and lock it in! If it all goes right you will have a matrix of fully hard martensite with some acceptable ferrite that is evenly filled with very fine chromium carbides.

If done right this stuff will be brittle and you dont wnat to mess around too long with it in that state. Tempering it will take enough of that carbon back out of the supersaturated solution and toughen the matrix as well as allowing even more nice little abrasion resistant carbides to form.

It sounds like a lot and too much to handle, and it is if all you have is a magnet and a bucket of oil and your best guess, it probably is. But the folks who designed that steel already worked it all out for you and put it in print for anybody who wants to give it a try. Bladesmiths are really makig it hard on themselves by dismissing this information and insisting upon reinventing the wheel with really odd practices.

NEVER apologize for asking questions in these discussions, that is the only way all of us can really work through this and learn. This includes myself, I use these discussions to work things out clearer for me and if there were no questions to cause us to think my initial post wouldn't be of much worth. I owe you a thank you for keeping the conversation on a strong constructive path.
 
You're welcome, Kevin.
I have no ego, so I'm not afraid to ask questions that make be appear as stupid ask I am - ask my friends! I mean, friend.
Anyway, just getting you warmed up to field questions in New York.
 
By the way, Stacy, that was a very concise and understandable explanation. We got this all done just in time for me to go harden two blades! During the course of this thread today, I've ground out, normalized, hand sand finished, stamped, milled in guard shoulders and cleaned up two blades. Oven's been soaking at 1525 for about 1 hour and oil is at 135.
Now I know what to do.
 
By the way Karl, I had been aware for some time of the pickling the scale off idea, but I just needed your encouragement and input to motivate me to finally do the obvious instead of piddling around with grinding it off and still tearing up belts. I just took some blades out of my acid mix after around 4 hours and they are pretty much clean and ready to grind.

I deviated from your recipe however and went with a 1/3 sulfuric acid to 2/3 vinegar mixture. Old habits and my welding days have me instinctively wanting to limit the time my steel soaks in hydrogen based stuff. But the method is very sound and I would not have taken the time to do such an easy thing to improve my life in the shop if not for you, thank you.
 
By the way Karl, I had been aware for some time of the pickling the scale off idea, but I just needed your encouragement and input to motivate me to finally do the obvious instead of piddling around with grinding it off and still tearing up belts. I just took some blades out of my acid mix after around 4 hours and they are pretty much clean and ready to grind.

I deviated from your recipe however and went with a 1/3 sulfuric acid to 2/3 vinegar mixture. Old habits and my welding days have me instinctively wanting to limit the time my steel soaks in hydrogen based stuff. But the method is very sound and I would not have taken the time to do such an easy thing to improve my life in the shop if not for you, thank you.

You are welcome, and I changed my container a little bit! I made a tube out of 4" pvc and a toilet flange for a base with a screw on top about 18" tall.
I use straight Muriatic acid, and after about a 4 hour soak, it washes off with water like clean new steel!
No scale to be found!
I still owe ya'.
 
Kevin, Thanks for the kind words. From you that is quite flattering. I think we have made a small dent in the mystique and BS of heat treatment, especially tempering.

For all you who would like to know more and do better -
Purchase a copy of "Heat Treaters Guide -Practices and Procedures for Irons and Steels" published by the ASM. It costs a lot, but you will never regret owning it. If you ever tire of it, you can get your money back from most any smith who needs one ( and we all do). Another good book is "Metallurgy Theory and Practice" by Allen.

I'm waiting to purchase the first copy (autographed, of course) of Kevin's book when it comes out.
Stacy
 
I want to add my thanks to those who contributed to this thread. Great information. Even those who asked questions as the got more clarification. I have come to believe that no matter how well I forge and grind, The steel the handle is all pales in compared to how well I heat treat and temper. Thanks for the really really great explanations and clarifications,
 
I thought I should show what Kevin mentioned above.
It's something I've been doing for a long time and removes 100% of the scale on your blades from forging and spherodizing.
I made a tank to hold muriatic acid, which I use straight. Put your blades in when they are cool. Just keep an eye on it, and in a few hours of bubbling and gurgling, take your blades out, hose them off, and they are totally scale free! It seems as if the acid only eats the scale - not the steel. They're not in long enough to cause any damage anyway.
Quit waisting belts and time to grind off scale!!!!!!
acidtank1.jpg


acid1.jpg
 
I want to add my thanks to those who contributed to this thread. Great information. Even those who asked questions as the got more clarification. I have come to believe that no matter how well I forge and grind, The steel the handle is all pales in compared to how well I heat treat and temper. Thanks for the really really great explanations and clarifications,
I once had a greatly respected and long time knife maker tell me "Jesus himself could send a bar of steel down from Heaven, but it'll only be as good as the heat treatment it gets!"
 
Excellent thread!

For every question I get answered, I find another four questions. THIS STUFF IS BRUTAL! Why the heck couldn't I have found an easier past-time to understand, like string theory or something?:D

Kevin, you had best start getting your rest in now (before Ashokan), as I suspect Karl and I are going to wearing you down like a pair of bulldogs hanging on that poor bull's nose!
 
I once had a greatly respected and long time knife maker tell me "Jesus himself could send a bar of steel down from Heaven, but it'll only be as good as the heat treatment it gets!"

That about sums it up
Thing is until I started listening to guys like this I didn't realize just how refined you could get the whole HT and what great improvements you could make to the blade by using the refined methods. Yes, I could harden a blade with my torch and some ATF and make a decent blade. Now I can get the heat just right with my kiln and pyrometer and know my quench oil is the best and doing its job. I know my dbl temper is doing what it should. I know my newer blades are far superior to my older ones and the best that they can be. Even if both knives will shave, you I know the new one is tougher and will shave longer. We don't want to make good knives. We want to make great knives!
 
I've got another favorite one that will scare you a little!
It's an old blacksmith saying, but it applies to us rather well:
"The most a blacksmith can hope for is to end up with as good a piece of steel as he started out with."
We have FAR more opportunities to screw up what we do than we have opportunities to make things right.
Don't screw up those important ones!
 
Muriatic acid is a 30 % solution of HCl in water. Best to play with it outdoors as the fumes tend to rust everything made of steel. Safety too, eye protection, rubber gloves. Don't heat it that will cause more problems with fumes .You can dilute it [acid into water] but it will take longer .
 
That's why I built that tube with the screw on lid. Since I did that, I haven't had the first rusting problem.
Before that, even with a tub with a snap on lid, everything in the entire shop that wasn't stainless............, you know.
 
If one continues to heat the steel to 500F some alloys will encounter a very annoying issue known by it technical name as TME (tempered martensite embrittlement) an obnoxious little situation where the accumulation of brittle carbides will cause a drop in impact strength along with a drop on hardness, creating a lose- lose situation.

L6temp.jpg


It pays to know of your alloy may experience this and either stop short of these temperatures and live with a higher hardness or shoot through it and go for a higher toughness.

I'm quoting this because I believe it bears repeating. Thanks for sharing it. Don't know about everyone else, but for a long time I always thought the relationship between hardness and toughness were inversely linear. In other words, I always thought steel got tougher as you tempered it softer with no surprises. However, your graph above really shows the importance of knowing the tempering response for your alloy, and choosing the proper alloy for your application in the first place. For example, if you think there's some magic Rockwell number your plades should be, (say, 58 rc) then it would not be wise to choose an alloy that has a big dip in its toughness curve right at that hardness.
 
Excellent thread!

For every question I get answered, I find another four questions. THIS STUFF IS BRUTAL! ...


That is how you know you are getting to the good stuff. Every experiment or study that I do is held to the test of how many more questions did it spawn beyond the ones that it answered. Ones that don't have me scratching my head are not very productive.

Making one or two knives for a hobby can be simple. Find some old files, shape them, heat them up with some lfame and stick them in some old cooking oil, then sharpen them and enjoy. But if you are going get really serious and compete in a market full of hype and misunderstanding while confidently selling your blade as something better than you could get from a factory, it will be anything but simple! If you ask a maker how to make such a blade and he tells you that if you do "A+B" you will get "C" every time, neither of you know much about steel and this is not going to change anytime soon. The only truthful answer is that if you do "A+B" you could get "C" if "A" included process "N" at temperature "F", and then only if you are really seeing "C", which sometimes could be "L" but looks very much like "C". "B" is only really effective if done within "R" seconds of the final part of the curve (see applicable charts).

This may sound like I am being diffucult, but come on people, if we are going to believe that some joker behind his garage has topped all the methods developed by industry for the last century, don't you think it should consist of a little more than "A+B=C" with an old lawnmower blade? Before you tell the world that the metallurgists are all wrong shouldn't you at least know a little more than 1% of what they do on the topic?
 
Back
Top