The NEW Post Your Campsite/gear/knife/hiking/anything Outdoorsy Pic Thread!

Owen, great pictures! That river with rapids, small waterfalls and those plateaus it forms,... great scenery!

Redsquid, especially that wharnie is looking amazing! I find sheepsfoot/wharncliff type blades to be extremely good cutters. The only ones I've got are incorporated in old Belgian Army and Navy multitools. They work perfect, but are a bit heavy for hikes/camping trips of longer durations. Definitely a keeper, that one!
 
Galeo, thank you.

Here is another one that I made. I forgot to clean up the excess glue before I took the pictures. I think this one is more of a sheepsfoot rather than a wharncliffe.

7791712358_fe9b971425_b.jpg


7791694150_1c800b0284_b.jpg


7791718496_ffb0aa2e6d_b.jpg


I really need to spend some time in Glacier and Smokey Mountains before I kick the bucket. Those pictures are so beautiful.
 
Last edited:
Well, the ones you put here are enough to make me salivate. Some parts of my "4 year plan" change, but Glacier being near the top of the list doesn't.
Thanks!:thumbup:

Glacier really is amazing. It's incredible the difference between the East side of the park and the West. When you go you definitely have to go on the Highline trail. I was a little bummed as it was still snowed in while I was there. This was in late June :D

Yeah, thanks for sharing those. Spectacular scenery! You had one awesome campsite :)

The campsite was really beautiful. Of course after that we had 20 MPH winds with rain / hail and trees snapping.

Here are some more from last week, from a few places around GSMNP and DuPont State Park:

Really great pictures! I've been to GSMNP Once and had a really good time. I like the picture of the triple falls!
 
Last edited:
Owen, great pictures! That river with rapids, small waterfalls and those plateaus it forms,... great scenery!
Glad you guys enjoyed the pics. I'd love to camp on one of those spots with the water running on either side. I'd probably sleep half the day away if it was cool outside:)
 
I had to take a week or so off, with no extra activity. I decided to take it easy this week, too, since I have a lot planned for next week.
Did take a walk around and near a park yesterday with a lunch date(midday light was horrible for pics), and played on my bike today at my spot I go to about 3 miles from my house. It's really nice out today!
dscn3494e.jpg


dscn3516d.jpg


dscn3529y.jpg


dscn3560fj.jpg


dscn3578u.jpg


dscn3588f.jpg


dscn3590rz.jpg
 
Nice! Those bike shots came out really well. I'm envious of how your sky and landscape shots properly expose. Ugh, makes me disgusted with my camera in bright light.
 
'Cause the sun was behind me, and it was cloudy! I'm curious if there are some kind of filters for P&S cameras that might fit the lens when the camera is on, but haven't looked.
 
Haha, ah! I tried using my polarized sunglasses as a filter once... :D Worked somewhat too...

I need to get some outside time. Been a while with work and all. Been getting into trail-running too, so I haven't been taking the camera on those trips. Might start to though.
 
Lambertiana I envy you. The King's Canyon pictures are really impressive, and I will go there someday and enjoy it IRL.

Here is what I came up with, fiddling around with 154CM. With these designs, I was focused on lightweight cutting tools for ultralight backpacking. Most of these have a cutting edge between 2 to 2.5". The one on the far left is .125" thick and the others are .109" thick. The one on the far right really appeals to me. It weighs about an ounce, and a kydex sheath for it would also weigh about an ounce. I would carry it in the mess kit, so I wouldn't need any nylon cord to carry it around my neck. When backpacking, I don't split firewood or build lean-to shelters, or skin any animals or build snares. I walk with groups of 6 - 10 people, and we bring a lot of freeze dried and dehydrated food. Cutting chores on these trips are limited to cutting nylon cord, whittling an occasional tent stake, or minor food prep, such as slicing sausage.

Which do you guys think would be the most suitable, and why? Thanks for feedback.

Oh, and please ignore that stick tang thing in the middle. That's definitely not going to be ultralight. :D

8254205324_2cc48a4e03_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
The two on the left might do better for making shavings and stuff like that, but for a little utility knife, I like the first wharncliffe, third from right. Least angular handle, edge straight to the ricasso, highest grind, should be the most comfortable and best looking.
 
That's the one I'd pick as well, with the one next to it on the right as a very close second choice. When I'm backpacking, the only thing I do is maybe make stakes, open food packaging, food prep, maybe some firemaking, maybe some cord cutting, maybe cloth cutting. Either would do a good job opening fish. I like the utilitarian sheepsfoot blade, and the more acute wharnie would offer a little more tip precision. Both remind me of a carbidized Ti Necker I had from Ban Tang a while back and regrettably lost on an abalone diving trip:

a9ea1821.jpg


Like Owen, I prefer the lack of choil on the third from right, it seems like the sharpening choil on the next one is a bit large for my tastes, but hard to tell from this pic. I find that the larger sharpening choils tend to get snagged on stuff, and of course the cutting edge is further out. If that one didn't have the choil, it'd probably be my first choice. I also like the FFG vs the Saber, but could live with the saber just fine for a knife this small and thin. I like that the handles are less constrained on those two as opposed to the one on the right. As I mentioned, the tip on the 2nd from right is finer and would offer more precision in a pinch grip if you're using the tip, but I could certainly work with the 3rd from right's tip just fine as well. Lastly, it seems like the 2nd from right has a little more meat in the handle for the last three fingers. A little hard to tell, but it looks like my medium sized hands should fit all four fingers on the handle, a must for me. Can you take more material out of those two handle tangs for less weight and still balance well with scales (akin to the 2 on the left)?

I don't know if I'm crazy about the relatively aggressive concave handle designs (the 3rd from right is the most versatile), they tend to be very dependent on fitting specific hands. And I often use the chest-lever grip to take off material quickly, and the concave handle designs aren't as conducive to those grips, though one can make it work. I wouldn't be doing extensive carving projects with a knife like this, so it wouldn't be so crucial.

My third choice would be the 2nd from left. It looks like there's enough flat edge to carve wood without slipping off too easily once you hit the belly, and the more centered tip would be nice for the rare drilling or pounding into a log for a static cutting edge, vs the sheepsfoot/wharnie designs. I also like the handle design on that one; it looks to have a good length and would do well in a variety of grips. I don't know how that little point on the bottom back of the handle on the 2nd from left and 2nd from left would work out in an actual grip, but it looks like it may not contribute greatly to grip comfort, perhaps even making the grip with the last 3 fingers a little awkward. Hard to tell. The integral guard on that one also looks a little obtrusive and perhaps unnecessary for the ways I like to use knives. But it wouldn't be a deal-breaker I think, for a sporadic use knife, and it'd make for a nice retention hook for a kydex sheath.

So I guess in summary, I'd pick:
1) 3rd from right
2) 2nd from right
3) 2nd from left

Great job! I may have to pick something up from you in the coming year :) What's the hardness on these?
 
That's the one I'd pick as well, with the one next to it on the right as a very close second choice. When I'm backpacking, the only thing I do is maybe make stakes, open food packaging, food prep, maybe some firemaking, maybe some cord cutting, maybe cloth cutting. Either would do a good job opening fish. I like the utilitarian sheepsfoot blade, and the more acute wharnie would offer a little more tip precision. Both remind me of a carbidized Ti Necker I had from Ban Tang a while back and regrettably lost on an abalone diving trip:

Like Owen, I prefer the lack of choil on the third from right, it seems like the sharpening choil on the next one is a bit large for my tastes, but hard to tell from this pic. I find that the larger sharpening choils tend to get snagged on stuff, and of course the cutting edge is further out. If that one didn't have the choil, it'd probably be my first choice. I also like the FFG vs the Saber, but could live with the saber just fine for a knife this small and thin. I like that the handles are less constrained on those two as opposed to the one on the right. As I mentioned, the tip on the 2nd from right is finer and would offer more precision in a pinch grip if you're using the tip, but I could certainly work with the 3rd from right's tip just fine as well. Lastly, it seems like the 2nd from right has a little more meat in the handle for the last three fingers. A little hard to tell, but it looks like my medium sized hands should fit all four fingers on the handle, a must for me. Can you take more material out of those two handle tangs for less weight and still balance well with scales (akin to the 2 on the left)?

I don't know if I'm crazy about the relatively aggressive concave handle designs (the 3rd from right is the most versatile), they tend to be very dependent on fitting specific hands. And I often use the chest-lever grip to take off material quickly, and the concave handle designs aren't as conducive to those grips, though one can make it work. I wouldn't be doing extensive carving projects with a knife like this, so it wouldn't be so crucial.

My third choice would be the 2nd from left. It looks like there's enough flat edge to carve wood without slipping off too easily once you hit the belly, and the more centered tip would be nice for the rare drilling or pounding into a log for a static cutting edge, vs the sheepsfoot/wharnie designs. I also like the handle design on that one; it looks to have a good length and would do well in a variety of grips. I don't know how that little point on the bottom back of the handle on the 2nd from left and 2nd from left would work out in an actual grip, but it looks like it may not contribute greatly to grip comfort, perhaps even making the grip with the last 3 fingers a little awkward. Hard to tell. The integral guard on that one also looks a little obtrusive and perhaps unnecessary for the ways I like to use knives. But it wouldn't be a deal-breaker I think, for a sporadic use knife, and it'd make for a nice retention hook for a kydex sheath.

So I guess in summary, I'd pick:
1) 3rd from right
2) 2nd from right
3) 2nd from left

Great job! I may have to pick something up from you in the coming year :) What's the hardness on these?

Very nice necker in that picture. I have never lost a knife, but I would hate to, especially something nice like that. Thanks for all the feedback, you and Owen both. I just make knives as a hobby, but I still want them to be useful.

I got a little more artistic with the one on the far right. It is shaped to fit my hand.

For heat treatment, I send them to Texas Knifemakers, and here is their blurb: "Our intent is to temper the blades to a Rockwell “C” hardness of 58 or 59." So that's good enough for a hobbyist like me. I have carried and used a couple of my own knives, that were heat treated at Texas Knifemakers, and I think they keep an edge as well, or better, than my Buck Vantage.

I know what you mean about the choils. I hate the way they snag. I probably put that one on there to cover up a mistake I had made.

These all have a 2 1/2 to 3 finger grip, except for the second one from the left, which I can barely get my pinky onto. When I was making these, I just kept thinking "Minimalism. Minimalism."

I could do more skeletonizing, to shave off weight, like on the 2nd and 3rd from the right.

I need to do some research and find out what a saber grind is. I may have put a saber grind on some of these, without even knowing it.

Here is a picture of the same knives, flipped in the opposite direction.

8253943683_8f1a6afc9d_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
I think you're well on your way to great utility knives :thumbup: And the heat treat sounds good. I don't know what's optimal for 154cm, but I like harder steel in small knives.

I prefer a full finger grip, even with a small blade, but of course that's my own personal preference. I can definitely understand the aim for minimalism; 2.5-3 finger grips do make for smaller and therefore lighter knives.

Saber, as I understand it, is just another term for a high flat grind, where you have a bit of full stock below the spine before flat grinding down to the edge. Your grinds still look decently high though, and in that thickness, I don't think I'd find it to be a big deal in practical use.

All in all, good stuff :thumbup: I'm looking forward to seeing the finished product. What are you thinking for scales? (I'm assuming the 2nd and 3rd from right are getting scales).
 
Mano, for scales, I have got some o.d. and white G10, both in 1/16". I think I will layer them together for contrasting colors. Kind of a heavy material, but with handles this small, it won't make much difference, and I like the feel of G10.
 
Cool, looking forward to seeing them polished.

ETA: I have a thermorun Fallkniven WM1 in Thermorun, I'd love to get a blank rehandled with Orange grippy G10, like mtwarden's and my new Kershaw Skyline FB.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top