- Joined
- Nov 9, 2012
- Messages
- 9,758
Lovely! Maybe something about the maker?
Thanks for the reminder - updated.

The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Lovely! Maybe something about the maker?
Beautiful damascus pattern. Looks like a raindrop pattern to me. But super nice!Timo Javanainen (Javanainen Forge):
Overall length: 8.27″
Blade length: 3.94″
Blade thickness: 0.12″
![]()
A tool that resembles prehistoric flints and obsidian cutters for processing meat and hides. All you need is enough grip to guide the edge.It's smaller than I personally like, but I think this old puukko is beautiful.
I have the Twin of that puukko, made by "Luomanen & Kumppanit" (L&K) which was in business from 1922-1945, in Kauhava, Finland, so your puukko may be older than you think. JohnIt's smaller than I personally like, but I think this old puukko is beautiful.
Not my puukko, but thanks for that bit of information J John A. Larsen . I have a starting point should I decide to go searching for one of my own.I have the Twin of that puukko, made by "Luomanen & Kumppanit" (L&K) which was in business from 1922-1945, in Kauhava, Finland, so your puukko may be older than you think. John
That sounds interesting and WORK is exactly what the puukko is meant forI spent half-day yesterday whittling two bows (nephew and me). I used one of the puukkos, top one in the picture. For this type of work they are excellent. I'm a bit sore today, but no hot spots / blisters. For sure, I wouldn't have liked one of the modern bushcrafting knives with large, heavy blade and unergonomic handle.
![]()
A wonderful example, the wood looks unusual and yet very durable from use. A small size knife can be very handy, I've stopped using massive kitchen knives and much prefer a compact paring or office knife- safer, faster and more dextrous . Likewise, this may well have been good at skinning but likely for fish and kitchen work too.It's smaller than I personally like, but I think this old puukko is beautiful.
I have one of those modern bushcraft knives and I think that the handle is actually quite comfortable and ergonomic. The only problem is the weight as you pointed out. For an extended carving session give me the Tommi every time.I spent half-day yesterday whittling two bows (nephew and me). I used one of the puukkos, top one in the picture. For this type of work they are excellent. I'm a bit sore today, but no hot spots / blisters. For sure, I wouldn't have liked one of the modern bushcrafting knives with large, heavy blade and unergonomic handle.
![]()
Th wood looks like mildly figured curly birch to me, with the patina of years.A wonderful example, the wood looks unusual and yet very durable from use. A small size knife can be very handy, I've stopped using massive kitchen knives and much prefer a compact paring or office knife- safer, faster and more dextrous . Likewise, this may well have been good at skinning but likely for fish and kitchen work too.
Found this baby in a box today and took it to work.
![]()
![]()
It's a hundred years old but it's sharp as hell!
![]()
Endura for scale.
![]()
I think the second option. I saw old Finnish group photos. Bank employees in Vyborg, Sunday photo at the church. Similar knives were hanging on the jackets and tunics of adult men.Well that's a great find, glad to see it's still serviceable.
Out of curiosity, were little puukkot like that popular and intended for children to use, or were they popular for general use by anyone who didn't want to carry something larger and bulkier?
I've posted this, too. Consider that native English speakers often mistake "its" for "it's" and use an apostrophe to make a word plural. We're both shouting into the wind.By the way, plural of puukko is puukot.
Just thought I'd share since I see that mistake made often.
Not that it matters much but anyway.![]()
By the way, plural of puukko is puukot.
Just thought I'd share since I see that mistake made often.
Not that it matters much but anyway.![]()
I've posted this, too. Consider that native English speakers often mistake "its" for "it's" and use an apostrophe to make a word plural. We're both shouting into the wind.![]()
Indeed we are! But its our time to waste, irregardless.Your wasting you're time.
![]()