- Joined
- May 5, 2006
- Messages
- 1,968
I don't think anyone's mentioned K5 Tactical. That guy made getting one a seriously miserable experience...but if it finally did come it was one serious dispenser of pain and destruction.

The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Why is no one mentioning the VTAC???
The VTAC is the first one I thought about. But $250.00 was mentioned so I thought a bit more expensive.
I just bought a 2nd one from Cutlery Shoppe... about $108 including S&H!!! So for <$250, get one for each hand!!!
Definately check out Vec's hawks! :thumbup:
![]()
![]()
![]()
AND if you are 3' tall.
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha...NOT!!! :thumbdn:
I only have hawks for 2 reasons:
1) Throwing
2) Hand-to-hand combat
I don't think anyone's mentioned K5 Tactical. That guy made getting one a seriously miserable experience...but if it finally did come it was one serious dispenser of pain and destruction.
![]()
Good luck with thatYou'll have limited ability for blocking/parrying/hooking and virtually no reach.
With a long handle you can always choke up for a shorter length but if you have a short handle extra length won't magically appear when you need it.
Good luck with thatYou'll have limited ability for blocking/parrying/hooking and virtually no reach.
With a long handle you can always choke up for a shorter length but if you have a short handle extra length won't magically appear when you need it.
Who cares about what length so-and-so or who's-its-name prefers? It's preference. I very much doubt that many people on this forum have real hand to hand combat experience with 'hawks different styles and lengths.
Different attributes have different advantages/disadvantages. If that weren't true knives and axes would only come in one flavor. I like throwing, I like short handles. Who cares? Besides, reach is all well and good until someone gets inside it--at that point the issue is moot in my humble opinion.
Military Stryker units don't seem to have a problem with the VTAC's length... they had a problem (some did) with the sheath, hence the newer leather offering. Likewise, troops in the late '60's and early 70's in Vietnam didn't seem to have a problem with the Vietnam Tomahawk's dimensions, either. Do you have any documentation/pictures showing longer hawks being used in the military?
OK, me personally... I would only have the VTAC as my secondary weapon if I were hiking, my 6' hiking spear would be for reach and would be in my hands while hiking, it would be the primary weapon in this case. At home... the VTAC is mounted on the wall near my bed. But then... I have a 9mm and 12 guage just as close, so the VTAC is never my primary weapon.
All fact....Good info !!!!
http://www.rmjtactical.com/ what do you think of these?
Military Stryker units don't seem to have a problem with the VTAC's length... they had a problem (some did) with the sheath, hence the newer leather offering. Likewise, troops in the late '60's and early 70's in Vietnam didn't seem to have a problem with the Vietnam Tomahawk's dimensions, either. Do you have any documentation/pictures showing longer hawks being used in the military?
.