- Joined
- Feb 28, 2002
- Messages
- 13,348
Indeed.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Indeed.
Well, as those of you that have followed this thread know, I posted here and in retrospect, feel very badly about the way I treated Bob. I can't help being blunt, it's just the way I am, but I should have been more tactful; or failing that, kept my durn mouth shut. My hearfelt apologies, Bob. It is, indeed, a masterpice, and my comments mean nothing.
Makers can benefit greatly from participation on BFC. There are many different factors involved in success, but Russ Andrews, Don Hanson, Marcus Lin, David Sharp and Nick Wheeler just to name a few off the top of my head, have ALL become quite prominent and respected makers, much of that due to participation and positive reception from fellow Forumites. I have often said that this is a double edged sword, and it is reasonable that if you benefit from BFC, you should also be able to take criticism and benefit from that as well .without copping an attitude.
Karda, it isnt that nobody has been able to post only good things, however the theme that you have been promoting, in your words is All need to remember that what is being commented on/critiqued is another persons hard work and product of their business. Something which can be affected by such commentary/critique and something in which the one being critiqued has much more a stake that the on(e) doing the critiquing. The commentor/critic owes it to the one being critiqued the common courtesy and respectfulness to do no/as little harm as possible.
First of all, I probably have as much money tied up in custom knives as many makers have tied up in their ENTIRE knifemaking operation. The idea that a maker has more at stake than a collector is fallacious. We are ALL in this together. The collector and maker are tied together as much as any other relationship that is symbiotic. My fellow collectors by-and-large work extremely hard to make the money that they do to feed their families, and have some cash left over for the pursuit of custom knife collecting.
There are makers that engage in predatory and nefarious business practices. This can be discussed here on BFC in The Good, Bad and Ugly s/f in The Exchange. There is a Gallery section for photos to be posted, without fear of negative commentary, one would hope. The Custom and Handmade Knife s/f is for the pursuit of many of the subjects that you seem to find fault with.
Peter Gill, Joseph Paranee, Roger Pinnock, and myself are all friends, and have been for many years. We all have passion and many years of collecting knives, and this binds us. We are all as different personality, interest and even politically wise as could possibly be. We met through these forums.
It is an imperfect world. I think many past prolific posters such as Anthony Lombardo, Stephen Foster, Michael Gettier, Riad Nasr ..have drifted off into different things and they havent readily and quickly been replaced by other highly experienced collectors. This has left a vacuum and changed the experience of Custom and Handmade s/f, but not necessarily for the worse. Nature abhors a vacuum, and posters like Coop, Lorien, Ken, Bob Betzner and others have stepped in to fill this void.
For myself, if I had more time to devote to it, I would continue to critique, albeit with a softer touch than I did ten years ago. I think it benefits EVERYONE with a stake in the game to continue critique on this s/f on BFC in whatever manner is most beneficial.
Best Regards,
STeven Garsson
And Critics such as yourself should be able critique without causing an attitude. If fact some could say that you owe it to the hobby to do as little harm as possible and be objective in your review. By the same token.. the critic should be able to take criticism as well.....without copping and attitude or playing the martyr.Makers can benefit greatly from participation on BFC. There are many different factors involved in success, but Russ Andrews, Don Hanson, Marcus Lin, David Sharp and Nick Wheeler just to name a few off the top of my head, have ALL become quite prominent and respected makers, much of that due to participation and positive reception from fellow Forumites. I have often said that this is a double edged sword, and it is reasonable that if you benefit from BFC, you should also be able to take criticism and benefit from that as well .without copping an attitude.
Its quite amusing to see how entitled some feel when they've spent money. I doubt you are "subsidizing" these makers enough that they will let you run their business. Most collectors don't feed their families by their collecting. Most knifemakers do. Theres the difference.Karda, it isnt that nobody has been able to post only good things, however the theme that you have been promoting, in your words is All need to remember that what is being commented on/critiqued is another persons hard work and product of their business. Something which can be affected by such commentary/critique and something in which the one being critiqued has much more a stake that the on(e) doing the critiquing. The commentor/critic owes it to the one being critiqued the common courtesy and respectfulness to do no/as little harm as possible.
First of all, I probably have as much money tied up in custom knives as many makers have tied up in their ENTIRE knifemaking operation. The idea that a maker has more at stake than a collector is fallacious. We are ALL in this together. The collector and maker are tied together as much as any other relationship that is symbiotic. My fellow collectors by-and-large work extremely hard to make the money that they do to feed their families, and have some cash left over for the pursuit of custom knife collecting.
The C&H forum is for the discussion of C&H knives......by anyone. Anyone can post and discuss there without approval.There are makers that engage in predatory and nefarious business practices. This can be discussed here on BFC in The Good, Bad and Ugly s/f in The Exchange. There is a Gallery section for photos to be posted, without fear of negative commentary, one would hope. The Custom and Handmade Knife s/f is for the pursuit of many of the subjects that you seem to find fault with.
I know STeven of all people needs no defense, but to even insinuate that his commentary over the years, no matter how crassly delivered, has on balance done the hobby harm, is laughable.
Thank your for the kind words Seth.
Have not done the hobby harm....I have promoted it and bettered it.
I did do Marcus Lin's career harm, and it permanently changed my approach. I have tried to make amends as best as possible, it was an overarching, ego-driven fiasco.
That was funny, Lorien, good on the attempt to lighten it up a bit.:thumbup:
I'm glad Karda is amused that myself and many others have spent hard earned money on custom knives, but as he does not promote or participate in the custom knife arena, his words must be given the attention and consideration that they are worth.
Best Regards,
STeven Garsson
Yet, I'm involved directly in sales and manufacture of handmade knives, so obviously I must know something.
Before taking stock in any review by Kohai999, one should actually consider what the purpose for the review is...
Is It genuinely to help the hobby and/or maker? or is it to boost self/forum image?
I know STeven of all people needs no defense, but to even insinuate that his commentary over the years, no matter how crassly delivered, has on balance done the hobby harm, is laughable.