horseclover
Basic Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2000
- Messages
- 3,233
[video=youtube;4i45jTqZuu8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4i45jTqZuu8[/video]
We are still looking at dimensional differences to compensate for the lack of weight. Who the heck isn't using pneumatic for those all day chores? Anyway, I thought the topic was swords. The video simply points out that it has to be bigger and longer than the Estwing. I'll bet some do buy these hammers and some even sharing glowing reviews. Look at the nails themselves. Eight penny, c'mon. Three solid whacks for a trained monkey using the steel hammer shown. I used to have a boss scoffing at others at times that just because it's an 8, that doesn't mean you need to whack it 8 times.
Back to swords. If someone were intent on matching the performance of a lowly spadroon in ti (less than the weight of an Estwing ripping hammer), the end result would be something much larger and truly less effective for the same body motions.
Aside from poking, what advantage would you expect in duplicating one of these slim straight jobs in ti?
Cheers
GC
We are still looking at dimensional differences to compensate for the lack of weight. Who the heck isn't using pneumatic for those all day chores? Anyway, I thought the topic was swords. The video simply points out that it has to be bigger and longer than the Estwing. I'll bet some do buy these hammers and some even sharing glowing reviews. Look at the nails themselves. Eight penny, c'mon. Three solid whacks for a trained monkey using the steel hammer shown. I used to have a boss scoffing at others at times that just because it's an 8, that doesn't mean you need to whack it 8 times.
Back to swords. If someone were intent on matching the performance of a lowly spadroon in ti (less than the weight of an Estwing ripping hammer), the end result would be something much larger and truly less effective for the same body motions.
Aside from poking, what advantage would you expect in duplicating one of these slim straight jobs in ti?

Cheers
GC