Having read a bunch of snippets, anecdotes and whatnot about him and his teaching over the years my position is that there would be little if anything to recommend to a friend and perhaps it has some worth to a stranger. It's not worth me dwelling on whether there has been lying or fraud or whatever. Although in meatspace I would say that I do tend to call a spade a spade and there are sufficient arrows pointing in that direction to motivate me to avoid it, proven, unproven, or just a bad smell I can live without. Nope, I can make a case strong enough to get me to avoid it without needing to address any of that. By analogy my case is as follows: Courses like that strike me as like someone asking me to find a good driving instructor for their child. One might be as good as another at endowing the child with the basics of driving, good enough to pass their driving test even, but only one of them prattles on about a bunch of irrelevant 'spiritual' stuff that has nothing to do with anything during the process. Nobody I like would thank me for finding their child one like that. In fact, I'd anticipate complaints along the lines of; well, he's teaching me to drive ok but you're not the one stuck in a car with him while he goes on about all this other crap he's into. I just want to learn to drive, couldn't you have picked one of the many others that'll stick to the brief and just do that?. I guess that tells you something about the intolerance of the people I'm friendly with, but I think they'd have a right to be. I wouldn't have liked it either. In fact, I'd feel a bit insulted at despite having a grasp of the internal combustion engine apparently some 'spiritual' element was what gave it propulsion. I figure a mechanical understanding is all that is required to make it functional and predictable, nothing else is required. Same with these schools, keep it simple, understand how it works and why. Nothing else is necessary or desirable, why make it harder with a veneer of crap. That said, I can see how it might help some others learn. I believe a good acronym for them as adults is GROLIES. And I can certainly get how embellishment or fictional components can help young children learn. I might describe to a child that their hard drive rotates by using imagery from a magickal land with invisible spiritual hamsters inside their computer that tread an imaginary magickal wheel. BS can have it's uses like that when overcoming a comprehension disorder. But downside is once they've come of age you've go to go back and amend all that teaching aid imagery; dump santa, the tooth fairy, dicky-birds, and all that. Obviously if the information is hard to get across in plain speak invoking all that bogus imagery could pay dividends and the ignorant punter still gets to learn something so they are happy. Still, I'm well rooted in the first scenario and not this, not when dealing with unimpaired adults. Go straight for the brain of how and why, cut the crap and keep on target.