People will love to bash on this, but I would group AUS8 together with some of the other common steels out there, like 440C, Sandvik 14C28N, 8Cr13MoV, VG10 and even S30V to some extent. There's some slight differences in corrosion resistance, toughness, edge retention, sharpenability and overall performance; but nothing that really warrants an extra $50 between the one or the other. What I
can say is VG10 has the best overall performance of the bunch and S30V the best edge retention, but that's about it. I wouldn't recommend any of my friends to dish out the cash to get VG10 instead of AUS8 cause frankly I don't see the difference in my everyday usage (this is just my opinion and YMMV).
And it's funny to me that some would argue against the need of a strong lock and then argue for a very, very small real world difference in the common steels out there; saying AUS8 will roll too easy and whatnot. I mean, I know I need a good lock if I'm doing some wood carving cause most locks will develop both lateral and vertical blade play or wear quite a bit just from doing simple every day medium duty tasks in the backyard. A steel that wont roll is however something I've rarely found any usage for when I'm not deliberately abusing the knife, not even in the countless cheapo Sandvik 12C27 Moras (and I've used up plenty enough of those to know the limits with my eyes closed, doing everything from food prep and gutting fish to banging chips out of cinder blocks and opening paint cans with it).
All the steels mentioned above, including Sandvik 12C27, will imo hold a solid edge unless you profile them to a razor edge or try to cut steel or rock with it... and why would someone even do that with a $100 or even a $50 knife??? And if they do, then odds are that their VG10 will roll just as easily and their S30V will chip out on them so where does that leave us? It means they're paying
double the money for a steel that will perform better in a extremely narrow spectrum of abuse where "lower end" steels will roll and "medium" steels wont. Their inproper usage have to be
just right for it to make any difference and they're paying a premium for it. They're literally paying an extra $50 to be able to cut a slightly thicker dimension electrical wire. Or $50 to be able to apply a tad bit more sideways pressure if it gets stuck in a stubborn tree knot (which is something you shouldn't do anyways). If
that's how someone uses a $100 (or more) knife then he's got no right to poke fun at people who likes to cut branches or whatever with their folders without having the locks transformed into a deformed, beaten up mess. They're using a) a lock that can't handle the abuse b) with a steel that can
just barely handle a tiny bit more abuse, and c) with a pricetag that doesn't warrant any abuse at all. I don't get it...
That said. If I want a dress knife or tactical knife, then VG10 and S30V will do the trick. Packaging them in a thicker stock (massive) would also warrant a higher pricetag. I'm simply NOT gonna go beat on a 3 mm thick $110 G10 Endura in my backyard though. If someone out there thinks AUS8 rolling too easy or not is the best argument in that debate they'd better think again.
That happens a lot with Cold Steel and Strider and some others.
Lots of stories, parroting and other made up BS by people who have never even been in the same room with one of those knives let alone owned one.
They read a few forum posts and manufacture their own BS.....
Would these be the ones who opens an argument with "I've owned several Sebenza's and Striders and have no less than a thousand knives of which more than half are Spydercos"? I think I've run into a couple of those...
The great irony of it all is that these are exactly the type of users who would love the kind of
usable value Demko designed Cold Steels offer.
I just found a new siggie. :thumbup:
Cool.
Its human nature I think. Scientists, historians and archaeologists have been found to cling to old 'approved of' view points on more than one occasion not able to truly follow the facts where they lead them. Many things can contribute to their inability to step outside the box and view things in a different way. Religious beliefs are one such thing that gets in the way and in some ways I see almost zealot religious following behavior in some crowds of fans for knives. We won't get into name calling but when someone has a boxed in view of the world and something challenges that they either reject and cover up the findings indicating this or they try to change them to fit their paradigm of the world and how it works.
If the people viewing any knife were to simply forget the name on it and look at the knife only for what you see before you sticking with just the facts and not emotional attachment they may see the knife for what is there and what it by itself brings to the table. Look at the knives you love with the same eyes you use to scrutinize and pick apart the knives and companies you hate and it may help also. This is what I would say to people that have trouble following the facts where they lead them.
^This.