- Joined
- Jan 26, 2012
- Messages
- 29,050
.
I've never had a vic classic fail but I have used them appropriately.
I think there is more to this useful definition than just the tool. Seems the people might be the issue in some cases.
Useless is certainly subjective. Right tool for the right job is another consideration. If you are breaking a vic classic every year while back packing you are using the wrong tool. If your opinel can't successfully cut zucchini without the "lock" failing because it is defective out of box, it is the wrong tool. Cheap wrong tools get thrown away in my book, or they get used for the right purpose. I'm not wasting my time to research and fix an opinel. Sorry. There are much better options.Steering this back away from Night Rider's drift on Opinels and back to the question of what is or is not "useful"...
Your post reminds me that there is a third important definition for useful. Something along the lines of "the knife is well suited to my personal day to day uses."
I have or have had a bunch of knives that I recognize as being useful for other people but are really useless to me.
I have a couple of Schrade 5OTs in my roll. I love these little knives and think they're cool as anything. But they're just too small for my day to uses and for me, in the end, I find them useless.
I've had more Victorinox Classics than I can count. Used to pick up them as trade show freebies. Used one for several years as my primary UL backpacking tool. Ditto a small Camillus serpentine jack (aka peanut by another name). The Classics generally busted on me in a year's time and the Camillus was just too small for me. Useless knives IMO.
I inherited my grandfathers 6.5" hunting bowie. Has the notches from several of his deer. Cheap knife. Priceless family heirloom to me. Utterly useless in terms of what I do with knives. I think the same thing of the Buck 119 for that matter.
Obviously, I don't think this definition of useful/useless is too helpful in this context. It's like talking about preferences for beer, coffee or shoes. What works for one person may or may not work for another. Lots of folks like small lock backs, Vic Classics, Peanuts and large bowies. The fact that I personally don't find them useful or worse, consider them to be useless (for me), doesn't make them useless as a generality.
Point of fact... An Opinel #8 is quite useable right out of the box for most people in most situations. Yes, their wet condition performance can be improved. Yes, they require some maintenance that is unfamiliar to most American users. Yes, they have their limits. Most knives do.
I've never had a vic classic fail but I have used them appropriately.
I think there is more to this useful definition than just the tool. Seems the people might be the issue in some cases.
Last edited: