What is it about Survive! knives?

As much as I've enjoyed BF and I've been a member since the beginning. I've always enjoyed the chat as to survival knives but always wonderd who has actually relied on one in a true survival situation, because I have not
 
As much as I've enjoyed BF and I've been a member since the beginning. I've always enjoyed the chat as to survival knives but always wonderd who has actually relied on one in a true survival situation, because I have not

Rick, I think you have misinterpreted this thread. Survive! Knives is a trade mark, a manufacturer of knives.

But to answer your question, every time I peel an apple, I feel I am staving off starvation with my edc.
 
I don't wish to argue but it's no secret that Survive puts their blades out in small batches. This creates hype and buzz about the products. But somehow there are never enough. Even though the 5.1 sold out faster than any other model--their words. Does that make sense to you? What about simply anticipating future sales based on past successes? Use some of the money you just made to start a fresh run and buy your materials.
To me it seems gimmicky in the sense that it creates this illusion that the blades sell out so fast that Survive just cannot keep up.

Um, yes yes it is a "secret" even to the owners!
Exactly how many of each model do you think they make?

They have commented on a number of occasions that they DO use some of the pre-order money to purchase sufficient steel to make MANY MANY MORE of each model based on the popularity assessed at pre-order. There is, of course, a limit to what they can manage to produce, and the trouble is that the limit for some models ends up exceeding what they anticipated. I've bought knives from them on "clearance" because they made more than the market cared to consume, lucky me :) But other models just sell out faster than they can re-stock them. Yes, that does actually happen, it is NOT an "illusion" nor a "gimmick". Ever tried to buy a Carother's knife?

You do realize that the company was, previously, only 3 people, right? They're trying out two new employees now (or so the owner said in the subforum), but EVERY knife is sharpened and inspected by the owner. They can only produce so much product in a day.

And NO their batch size absolutely does NOT create "hype" about the products other than hyperbole like, "They take FOREVER! It must be a ponzi scheme! I'll be walking with a cane before my knife ever shows up!" That's the only "hype" I've been able to find regarding the availability of the knives. :p Which i think is funny, because I've never had a problem, I either pre-order or just watch for when they are available on the website, it's really not hard. *shrug* But they really are that good :thumbup:

The reality is that they do not have enough knives to go around b/c they don't make enough. It's a marketing ploy. Release 10 knives on the website on Monday knowing full well that at least 100 or more people are interested. What happens now? Some want the knife even more. Even if they give up, chances are they'll tell a buddy. Like magic, S! reaches more potential buyers than it ever could have with their forum here or the newsletter. Exposure equals more potential sales.

Have you seen them advertising? Here's what they did:
They offered customers a chance to pre-order from a list of knife models, and they put each model into production according to which got the most "votes" (i.e. pre-orders), but a trick to help them keep costs down is to only make ONE model at a time. The estimate how many of each model they can make with funds from the pre-order balanced against how many would actually sell (I'd guess 50% more but have no actual idea, they might make double or triple the number ordered). Then, after building the knives and shipping them out to the pre-pay customers, listing "blemished" models along the way as they turn up in production, they finally list the remaining knives for sale first-come-first-serve.

So how does S!K know "full well" how many customers want to buy a given model, besides the pre-order list? THAT would be magic.

As far as taking the money upfront to "build infrastructure," sure: that would be fine for a model or two when they first started but they have done it for every single blade they make. After all those knives sold and all that profit you mean to tell me that they don't have enough capital to pay for their production expenses? Come on now. Get a business loan. I don't like paying for something as ubiquitous as a 3v utility knife upfront and waiting 18 months for delivery. No thanks. Not when I could order a BRKT Bravo also in 3v and get it in a few days.

I have no idea what their finances are like, no idea how many thousands of "pre-orders" they got during the "starter campaign", but yeah, that WAS their "business loan". You call it "profit", but that is only true IF they didn't use the funds to build their infrastructure and also produce many MORE of each model for sale, which is what you suggested before and is indeed what they do. :thumbup: Have you never been part of a "Kick Starter" campaign? A recent one was for the DPx Urban, a folding knife that took 6 months from opening until delivery of the first models. Survive!'s GSO-5.1 took the same length of time, 6 months from beginning of production to delivery. Now, no body is demanding that you pay in and wait. Like you said, you could just order something from another company. :thumbup: Then do it and move along. Others are content to wait for what they see as a superior (sometimes exceedingly so) product from an honest business. *shrug* to each their own.

As far as being transparent these days, they sure are. It's only b/c quite a few customers complained about it. Orders were cancelled, and customers went elsewhere. It would be more accurate to say this was a "forced transparency."

No, I've followed them since he offered the first run of GSO-10s, and his production updates have been WAY beyond what I've seen from ANY other company, nothing "forced" about it. This Guy isn't like some company owners who needs to be lambasted in a public forum to give back $16,000 bilked from a potential business-partner (*hint-hint*). You can look back at their track-record of production updates - they are consistent since WELL before they gained the level of popularity currently suffered.

Finally, with regard to the retirement account: I put money into the 401k that is matched by my employer. It comes out of my 2 bi-monthly paychecks. When I reach a certain age and retire, all the money I and my employer contributed can be taken with interest to help me live. That is an investment in my future. When I pay Guy a year and a half before I see anything what do I get? Nothing. It's not an investment that helps me at all. It helps them and their bottom lines. I just get what I originally paid for. "Investing" in S! is nothing like investing in my retirement.

Your money comes out of your pay-check for YEARS before you get anything from it, and the "interest" it accrues is based entirely on market values. You can end up LOSING money as a result of inflation and poor returns. What eprcent-yield are you currently getting? 1%? less? But more than that, are you at all aware of WHERE the money you are paying is going? Who is getting it? What it's being used for? Lots of "distasteful" things being funded by retirement accounts, just sayin'.

When I pre-order a Survive! knife, I have gotten as much as a 10% discount, which is to say that, should I choose to re-sell the knife, my money has earned a 10% interest in less than a year :eek: But better than that, the knife I receive may be substantially better in quality and performance than a similarly priced competitor. My investment with this honest company pays dividends I could never hope to achieve with my 401k, IRA, or stock portfolio. :o

Lucky for me, I don't have the funds available to stock up on these knives and try to flip them, because the market will eventually saturate and those wishing to profit off their patience and the hard-work of Survive! will be annoyed. *shrug*
 
My investment with this honest company pays dividends I could never hope to achieve with my 401k, IRA, or stock portfolio. :o

LOL the shilling going on here is amusing to say the least. If your investments by buying a few knives far outstrips the performance of your stocks, 401k, or IRA to such a degree, you need a new financial advisor. Wow.

I am genuinely cracking up over here.

P.S. - 1%? What? What do you think this is? 2011?
 
Last edited:
I don't know why anyone would buy into the hype surrounding this company and subject themselves to years-long waits and empty promises when there are tons of super talented custom makers putting up knives for sale on Blade Forums' own exchange every single day.

Anthony Sculimbrene's recent blog post tells me everything I need to know about Survive! Knives (what a colossally dumb name, by the way): they took his money (full payment up front) for a knife listed as "in stock" which wasn't in stock. What more do you need to know?
 
Chiral,

I answered your post days ago. You got up on your soapbox and called my opinion and observations "BS." I had to answer someone so arrogant.

I made my points then and stand by them now. I've moved on. Why don't you do the same, bud?
 
LOL the shilling going on here is amusing to say the least. If your investments by buying a few knives far outstrips the performance of your stocks, 401k, or IRA to such a degree, you need a new financial advisor. Wow.

I am genuinely cracking up over here.

P.S. - 1%? What? What do you think this is? 2011?

Well, "shill": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill
Shill typically refers to someone who purposely gives onlookers the impression that they are an enthusiastic independent customer of a seller (or marketer of ideas) for whom they are secretly working.

I don't work for S!K, never have, but i definitely have money invested and am indeed an enthusiastic customer because I like what they make. I haven't seen anything on here that indicates that any of the respondents work for S!K (indeed, there is not much lauding going on, mostly just defending against specific criticisms), so perhaps you are just mis-using the word? *shrug*

Regarding the 401(k)'s, the "average" return in the USA is supposed to be ~5%, but if you talk with individuals at or approaching retirement, you'll find that the actual return, especially after taxes, is often less than half that, and yeah the crash killed a lot of people's accounts :( I'm no where near retirement but do watch the percent yield changes on my quarterly investment statements, and rarely do they approach 5%. Hence my comment.

Yeah, I may need a new financial advisor :o Any recommendations?

But my point was that the flippers are making a heck of a return on their investments. I'm not one, and do NOT recommend it as a business model or anything of the sort, I tend to beat on the knives, but the quality and performance is there for those who buy in and if it's not there has been a pretty decent market for re-sale, with better return than the average 401(k).


Chiral,

I answered your post days ago. You got up on your soapbox and called my opinion and observations "BS." I had to answer someone so arrogant.

I made my points then and stand by them now. I've moved on. Why don't you do the same, bud?

I thought your previous reply worthy of a response, as it included some wisdom which, thankfully, was already in play before you made your suggestions. But the wisdom was mixed in with BS assumptions, and I have willingly pointed them out. I am happy to move on since the BS has been sorted. :thumbup:


I don't know why anyone would buy into the hype surrounding this company and subject themselves to years-long waits and empty promises when there are tons of super talented custom makers putting up knives for sale on Blade Forums' own exchange every single day.

Anthony Sculimbrene's recent blog post tells me everything I need to know about Survive! Knives (what a colossally dumb name, by the way): they took his money (full payment up front) for a knife listed as "in stock" which wasn't in stock. What more do you need to know?

I should post a photo of the knives I own, because I VERY MUCH support the suggestion that folk check out the Maker's area :thumbup: I have more from there than from any given company. Amazing work for such little cost.

But what I don't see is this notion of "empty promises". You pay for a knife, you get said knife = promise fulfilled. I guess it is the expectation of delivery times that pisses people off. It doesn't piss me off because I've known from Day 1 what to expect and am a patient guy. *shrug* Every S!K review I have written, I start by WARNING people that buying from this company requires PATIENCE. When Guy posts, "these knives should be shipping out by Christmas," I just ignore him, knowing that he sucks at delivery estimates :p But he delivers, and that is what i care about.
The guy who didn't get his knife right away or felt lied to by the "in stock" label on the knife, I feel for his frustration BUT the question is, DID he get his knife, and when? How was the delay justified, and was it reasonable? (people will vary on what they consider "reasonable" here) And more than that, what did he DO in response to the delay? Did he author an internet blog post about how this company takes a long time to deliver their products and suggest that they be more up-front/realistic about delivery times, and then move on? Or did he publish a bunch of false defamatory comments about how their business operates (like Ratman above)? It's easy to take pot-shots on the internet, easy to give opinions, but it's much harder to back up assertions when challenged.
 
Last edited:
Edited: comment is off-topic.
 
Last edited:
But what I don't see is this notion of "empty promises". You pay for a knife, you get said knife = promise fulfilled. I guess it is the expectation of delivery times that pisses people off. It doesn't piss me off because I've known from Day 1 what to expect and am a patient guy. *shrug* Every S!K review I have written, I start by WARNING people that buying from this company requires PATIENCE. When Guy posts, "these knives should be shipping out by Christmas," I just ignore him, knowing that he sucks at delivery estimates :p But he delivers, and that is what i care about.
The guy who didn't get his knife right away or felt lied to by the "in stock" label on the knife, I feel for his frustration BUT the question is, DID he get his knife, and when? How was the delay justified, and was it reasonable? (people will vary on what they consider "reasonable" here) And more than that, what did he DO in response to the delay? Did he author an internet blog post about how this company takes a long time to deliver their products and suggest that they be more up-front/realistic about delivery times, and then move on? Or did he publish a bunch of false defamatory comments about how their business operates (like Ratman above)? It's easy to take pot-shots on the internet, easy to give opinions, but it's much harder to back up assertions when challenged.

This entire paragraph can be broken down thusly:

"All of the flaws in the maker's business plan can be forgiven because I like his product. You should ALSO have no issues with his poor business model, because the product is worth it." So, you are essentially an apologist for Guy's inability to run a timely business, which I gotta tell you, that's ridiculous, man. You can attempt to downplay the very real concerns that I, Ratman, and others have, but at the end of the day, they ARE valid, and it looks to me like nothing is going to change at S!K anytime soon. I frankly think there'll be a point where they close their doors. But that's just me. Also, it's nothing personal. I don't know anyone at S!K. I just have a general understanding of how businesses work, and there just seem to be a lot of questions here. I watched Skylar in that other thread get bashed, but he asked a pointed question that was never answered, which I think says it all, really: "I find it interesting that you are making knives to sell on Mondays, while people are waiting years for their knives."

That was conveniently overlooked in multiple responses from Ellie.
 
This entire paragraph can be broken down thusly:

"All of the flaws in the maker's business plan can be forgiven because I like his product. You should ALSO have no issues with his poor business model, because the product is worth it." So, you are essentially an apologist for Guy's inability to run a timely business, which I gotta tell you, that's ridiculous, man. You can attempt to downplay the very real concerns that I, Ratman, and others have, but at the end of the day, they ARE valid, and it looks to me like nothing is going to change at S!K anytime soon. I frankly think there'll be a point where they close their doors. But that's just me. Also, it's nothing personal. I don't know anyone at S!K. I just have a general understanding of how businesses work, and there just seem to be a lot of questions here. I watched Skylar in that other thread get bashed, but he asked a pointed question that was never answered, which I think says it all, really: "I find it interesting that you are making knives to sell on Mondays, while people are waiting years for their knives."

That was conveniently overlooked in multiple responses from Ellie.
The Monday sales are typically comprised of factory seconds that didn't meet qc requirements to fulfill standing orders thou.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 
Last sentence is an argument from popularity. I'm sure GSO makes good knives, but high demand does NOT equal quality.

True that High demand does not equal quality. But... High quality at a reasonable price does usually equal demand.
 
Last edited:
I've been watching the Exchange, and it seems more than any other brand, they sell really quickly and for what I consider a hefty amount? What am I missing by not trying one? What makes them in such demand?

I'll chime in my personal opinion on this brand of knife to try to get this thread back on track. All of these personal jabs and the colossally childish jab at the company's name are ridiculous to say the least.
Survive! makes a very functional and highly reliable tool out of high end steels at an affordable price. The ergonomics on them are ridiculously comfortable and I personally haven't had any issues with hot spots after long periods of use.
The pricing on these in the Secondary Market can get way out of control because a large majority of sellers think that they're entrepreneurs by buying low and selling high because of demand. In all honesty, these knives aren't that hard to get. I've owned over 24 of them throughout the last two years and I rarely ever spent more than $20 over retail. I've lost a bit of money on sales, but that comes with the territory.
As far as these "fanboy" comments go, the majority of Survive! owners are just like every other knife brand fans and we sometimes foolishly stick up for the companies we prefer.
In the subforum for Survive Knives, there is usually a lot of talk about their knives, but there's a lot of other comradery going on and that's a big seller point in my opinion. We BS about camping, hunting or just normal everyday crap just like the guys in othe knife specific forums.
As for the wait time.... Well it does suck. I waited a year for a 4.7 and to be honest, I'm glad I did. It's the most comfortable knife I've ever handled out of the hundreds that I've owned. The company has made a point to hire on another lady to help iron out some kinks, and there was some chatter about Guy trying to find someone to help with other tasks. Hopefully things will start to move at a better pace so the crew can put this issue behind them.
 
Man... I can also say I am REALLY tired of this topic and how it always devolves into an argument...


the best way to protest a company is to NOT buy their product. I dislike Bark River and how they pass off what would be a "second" in any other manufacturer's product as "handmade character". I dont go starting threads about it everywhere! I just dont buy thier knife. Same thing with a whole host of other companies. Just move on.
 
It happens on all forums with the: "may I stick my head up your arse, I just need to see if you are hiding something". Five minutes later: "have you got a torch, I could be a while... brought my sandwiches". After inspection: "No thank you, I was looking for something different".


Its another user knife maker, which I'm a fan of. They have given enough information to make my decision, and delivered. I'm not buying the company. As for those trying to make a buck due to demand, then to me thats a lot of work for not a lot and just messes everyone else about.
 
This entire paragraph can be broken down thusly:

"All of the flaws in the maker's business plan can be forgiven because I like his product. You should ALSO have no issues with his poor business model, because the product is worth it." So, you are essentially an apologist for Guy's inability to run a timely business, which I gotta tell you, that's ridiculous, man. You can attempt to downplay the very real concerns that I, Ratman, and others have, but at the end of the day, they ARE valid, and it looks to me like nothing is going to change at S!K anytime soon. I frankly think there'll be a point where they close their doors. But that's just me. Also, it's nothing personal. I don't know anyone at S!K. I just have a general understanding of how businesses work, and there just seem to be a lot of questions here. I watched Skylar in that other thread get bashed, but he asked a pointed question that was never answered, which I think says it all, really: "I find it interesting that you are making knives to sell on Mondays, while people are waiting years for their knives."

That was conveniently overlooked in multiple responses from Ellie.

It wasn't your "concerns" that i challenged, Quiet, it was the assertions. The BS about deliberately under-producing to drive demand and create hype when, sheesh, these people are having a hard enough time pumping out the numbers that they already produce! Or your assertion that a comment about them stocking knives for sale while others are waiting on the ones they pre-ordered months ago went "conveniently overlooked" - No, it categorically was NOT overlooked, did you just miss the answer? It's that kinda thing that bugs me and is really the only reason for the long replies, to answer falsehoods point by point. I'm not trying to excuse S!K's production delays, I'm trying to keep people from lying about what they are. I'm not trying to convince people to buy into a pre-order and then wait months and months for the outcome, in fact I'm telling them NOT to if they don't have the patience for it or interest in making that kind of investment - that's a personal thing. But to bad-mouth anyone that DOES buy in, and bad-mouth the company for even accepting the buy-ins in the first place (a move driven by customer demand for it), and peddle BS about their motives or prognostications of their demise??? That's just wrong. If you have "questions" about how the business is being run, why not ask instead of making false assertions? Doing so is a heck of a lot worse than my being "ridiculous" by answering BS directed against a small and young company that is still trying to get its feet under itself. YMMV
 
It wasn't your "concerns" that i challenged, Quiet, it was the assertions. The BS about deliberately under-producing to drive demand and create hype when, sheesh, these people are having a hard enough time pumping out the numbers that they already produce! Or your assertion that a comment about them stocking knives for sale while others are waiting on the ones they pre-ordered months ago went "conveniently overlooked" - No, it categorically was NOT overlooked, did you just miss the answer? It's that kinda thing that bugs me and is really the only reason for the long replies, to answer falsehoods point by point. I'm not trying to excuse S!K's production delays, I'm trying to keep people from lying about what they are. I'm not trying to convince people to buy into a pre-order and then wait months and months for the outcome, in fact I'm telling them NOT to if they don't have the patience for it or interest in making that kind of investment - that's a personal thing. But to bad-mouth anyone that DOES buy in, and bad-mouth the company for even accepting the buy-ins in the first place (a move driven by customer demand for it), and peddle BS about their motives or prognostications of their demise??? That's just wrong. If you have "questions" about how the business is being run, why not ask instead of making false assertions? Doing so is a heck of a lot worse than my being "ridiculous" by answering BS directed against a small and young company that is still trying to get its feet under itself. YMMV

I stopped reading at the bolded part. I made no such claims. You can't even keep who you're arguing with straight. Secondly, who are you to attempt to dress others down for, as you put it, "making assertions" when that is literally all YOU have done. You are a water-carrier, that much is clear. Therefore, to expect objective discourse with you, when you are 100% Koolaid for a company with the same business model as Will Moon had when he was actually making knives, is impossible.

Poor logic, poor argument, can't even keep who said what straight, I think we're done here. It's just the same pack of apologists, same as in the other threads. Is that Silver Needle I see reading? LOL Yeah, this is a waste of time at this point. Those who aren't firmly entrenched understand the facts. They want your money upfront, and you aren't getting anything for years. Meanwhile, you get to watch while they make knives for sale on their subforum (not all of those are seconds, sorry). Thankfully, people are growing more aware of these terrible business practices, so my reason for posting here is done. The apologists aren't able to keep covering up this bad business management anymore. Good evening.
 
Last edited:
Well, "shill": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill


I don't work for S!K, never have, but i definitely have money invested and am indeed an enthusiastic customer because I like what they make. I haven't seen anything on here that indicates that any of the respondents work for S!K (indeed, there is not much lauding going on, mostly just defending against specific criticisms), so perhaps you are just mis-using the word? *shrug*
So you're an investor, promoting a company? Sounds like a shill.
 
Last edited:
The Monday sales are typically comprised of factory seconds that didn't meet qc requirements to fulfill standing orders thou.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Somewhere along the line those seconds still took time and man power away from fulfilling orders. I believe that's the standing complaint that they have.
 
The Monday sales are typically comprised of factory seconds that didn't meet qc requirements to fulfill standing orders thou.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Somewhere along the line those seconds still took time and man power away from fulfilling orders. I believe that's the standing complaint that they have.
This is one thing I wouldn't have an issue with. Getting the seconds out of the workshop means they can't be mistakenly sent out in the orders when the firsts are finished.
I would be peeved if they weren't all seconds.
 
This is one thing I wouldn't have an issue with. Getting the seconds out of the workshop means they can't be mistakenly sent out in the orders when the firsts are finished.
I would be peeved if they weren't all seconds.

no kidding. If I am buying a second, I better be paying for a second
 
Back
Top