evilgreg
Why so serious?
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2012
- Messages
- 4,092
Either:
1) Buy a knife because you think its the sexiest thing ever; or
2) Buy a knife because you have thought about what you want to do with it, the knife is designed to do that, and you understand how the knife is designed to do that.
But don't confuse the two, or kid yourself one is the other. That's a waste of time and money.
IMO, this is particularly sage advice. I own a Busse TGLB in INFI because it's a nice looking toy that makes me happy, not because it can outperform a $30 Schrade in 1095 in any meaningful way (pro tip: it doesn't). I own any number of expensive small fixed blades because I like the way they look and they make me happy, but none of them really outperforms a $10 Mora when you get down to it. I have folders I paid over a thousand dollars for because they're nice to look at and fondle and make great pocket toys/jewelry, but most of them don't cut as well as a $25 Cold Steel Tuff Lite. I spend on knives as luxury items, but I never kid myself that paying more equates to any sort of performance return.
I find it half hilarious and half sad how many people on these forums buy into one cult or another, like the folks that believe a Rockstead knife can cut better than any other knife because mystical Asian heritage reasons or whatever (e.g. a CS-style bamboo whacking video), as if high-hardness steels or convex edges were somehow new or unique.
People should buy whatever they want to buy and enjoy their purchases, of course, but imagining a knife from CRK or Busse or Rockstead or < insert sexy custom maker of your choice > somehow outperforms (for actual cutting tasks) "lesser" knives is just silly.