- Joined
- Jan 28, 2006
- Messages
- 7,035
You know, we hear mostly about the Bravo-1, Northstar and Fox River on this forum it seems. I'm actually surprised how many came out with the Aurora being their favorite.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
You know, we hear mostly about the Bravo-1, Northstar and Fox River on this forum it seems. I'm actually surprised how many came out with the Aurora being their favorite.
I agree the Aurora is likely the perfect (or closest to it so far) woodscraft blade out there, for all the reasons you listed. If I was to go out and mix hunting and camping and only took one knife for woodscraft and game prep, the Fox River would be it. But since I like to carry dedicated tools for game prep, I've been really eyeballing the Wolf River.The Aurora has supplanted my Fox River as being my favorite all-around knife. Bigger handles, blade shape that is better suited for woodcraft. The base of the blade is lined up with the handle for easier notching, and the point is centered for better drilling. The Fox River is still a very, very close second, and would be my daily carry when a smaller blade is necessary or preferred, and I thought I would NEVER change mky mind on having it as my dedicated bushcraft blade. I also will use the Fox River as a dedicated skinning/cleaning blade, as it is admirably suited for that task.
So, my combo (to expand on this a little) is the BRKT Aurora and my Gossman PSK, Jr., both in my favorite steel: A2. For a chopper, I have an Ontario 22" machete, or Estwing 26" Camper's Axe, or Estwing Sportsman's Hatchet. I have an 8" blade Gossman covexed chopper on the way, and that will round out my ideal knife and tool combo.
Of course, my SAK Rucksack is always on me, as is my Gossman PSK, Jr., so if I got stuck somewhere without planning ahead, I'd feel ready.
The Aurora has supplanted my Fox River as being my favorite all-around knife. Bigger handles, blade shape that is better suited for woodcraft. The base of the blade is lined up with the handle for easier notching, and the point is centered for better drilling.......
I have a question for anyone who has made use of my handle shape and the shape similar to the aurora. On my handles I focus on a well rounded and thick but "simple" line from the ricasso to near the butt, with a downward slope. I've tried to refine this to maximize variable grips, minimize hot spots, and still provide a secure grip for pushing. (Note, this is helped a lot by the raltively short handle and shape of the rear portion)
I don't drop the front of the handle very often, but there is generally a very slight blade drop. One that doesn't seem to adversely effect the power carving near the blade.
So, for anyone who has used both, what kind of differences do you see?
I have a question for anyone who has made use of my handle shape and the shape similar to the aurora. On my handles I focus on a well rounded and thick but "simple" line from the ricasso to near the butt, with a downward slope. I've tried to refine this to maximize variable grips, minimize hot spots, and still provide a secure grip for pushing. (Note, this is helped a lot by the raltively short handle and shape of the rear portion)
I don't drop the front of the handle very often, but there is generally a very slight blade drop. One that doesn't seem to adversely effect the power carving near the blade.
So, for anyone who has used both, what kind of differences do you see?
once the BRK&T Magnum arrives to me for the pass around, i should be able to give you a pretty good comparison.
Barber, the Magnum handle is very different than the Aurora - it's the same as the Fox River, but bigger.
The Magnum is nothing like its smaller counterpart except reminiscent of the shape. It's a beautiful, heavy BEAST of a knife compared to the regular F.R. it feels almost more like a chopper than a bushcraft blade, but can do both. it feels like it could withstand a bomb-blast.