- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
- Messages
- 4,172
Does that make it a poor choice? Not at all! But there are potentially better choices that can in fact do some things better. Precisely why my personal choice, if I were to go back in time to my days in the infantry, would be an esee3 with molle sheath. Roughly the same size, Equally tough steel, equally sharp, full tang construction, a full 1/4" thinner, with a flatter profile, and better mounting options to vest or gear, with the added retention strap around the handle to help keep it secure from accidental loss like dislodging itself during maneuvers... From my own personal former infantry perspective, already rocking a fully combat ready packout in full battle rattle; plates, ammo, first aid kit, etc. that added 3oz., roughly equal to the weight of 7 more rounds of ammo, would hardly be the breaking point of how much one could carry at that point, but the small added benefits, IMO, would be well worth it over a bulky round plastic sheathed Mora with partial tang construction.... But I would absolutely and unquestionably take a Mora over nothing, 100%. I would absolutely give a Mora to someone who had nothing. Shoot, I might even throw the extra 2.5 oz. of the Mora into the bottom of my ruck as a backup option...
Well, I agree with your choice on the ESEE 3; that and the TOPS CUT 4.0 were my rotational choices when I was in in Afghanistan last (2017 to 2019). That said, I worked with the coalition forces on an advisory team and both Finnish and Swedish contingents were part of our team. I saw more than a few puukkos, and the Mora 2000 was the most common; which a Swedish "Ranger" instructor gifted me when his contingent redeployed.
He said they issued the Mora 2000 in their Ranger school (our version of SFAS) for their survival classes. For the most part, they're an inexpensive, pretty robust, light cutting tool...perfect for many occupations in combat and most assuredly for E&E and survival.
ROCK6