Thanks everyone for participating, and I would like to apologize to Mike Carter for my part in derailing his thread expressing deep satisfaction in his attainment of Voting Member status in the Guild, and on having a fun show.
The point of this thread is to make HELPFUL suggestions, no to be a bashfest. Everyone is behaving nicely, and it should remain that way. While there is no personal "fear" of Guild leadership, I respect that they are trying to do a good job and have no wish to contribute to the frustration factor. As one of the founders and Board members of the CKCA, I fully understand the frustrations that go along with a leadership position. It is my hope that they take note of this discussion, and "listen". They are of course under no obligation to do so, and my expectations are low.
When I started collecting knives in the late 1980's the Guild was THE organization to belong to....and I did ask makers if they were members....it didn't stop me from buying if they were not, but doing business with Guild knifemakers was important to me. I liked what the organization stood for.
I tried to get my business, High Hat Knives accepted for Associate Guild membership in a conversation with Guild President Frank Centofante in 1994, but was regretfully told that there were no openings available at that time. We never inquired again, and that is the only personal negative experience with the Guild I have to share.
Has the era of the mega-show passed? I know that some people are talking about Blade having to many exhibitors and not enough warm bodies paying to come in....I have also heard it said by more than one maker that in today's market, the optimum size for a major show may be somewhere in the 150 table range.
It is my hope that the Knifemaker's Guild could comfortably build up both the membership and the show to accomodate 250-300 excellent makers. I would consider that a good sized premium, but not "boutique" show(AKI, Solvang, Plaza....). I believe this is an attainable number with hard work, and is reasonable to manage, as well as making it desireable for both makers and collectors to attend.
Well I am not real good at this type of thing I some times tend to put my foot in my mouth but here goes. I have not been to a Guild show in quite awhile so I don't know what caliber of maker is getting in the Guild today so maybe before we all say to much we should take a look at some of the work because I tell you this for sure collectors are a whole lot smarter than they were at one time and if the Guild is taking on members for a head count and not good Quality knifemakers I assure you they are not going to make it.
Cliff, I think it is entirely possible to have a room full of makers who make technically perfect knives that look butt ugly, and have seen it at every show I attended. Things like blade-to-handle ratio, material and finish choices, as well as design parameters are matters of individual taste, and it would be neigh on impossible for a membership or judging committee to DQ an applicant for having questionable taste. Doesn't help the organization's goals much, but there is no rule against ugly.
Great question Steve, and a difficult one to answer and not sound like another complaint.
......I felt like a freshman in high school who had to watch my back or someone would use the Guild to hurt my business and reputation. I have always used CNC machines in my business, and that was an ongoing debate as well, even though I have always been open and honest about my use of the technology.
I decided to put my efforts into the ABS. I had just received my MS stamp and there were many avenues to help the organization and furthur my business.
...So, to bring this post to conclusion, If the Guild could educate makers on proper business practices, planning production, scheduling work to be able to pay bills AND have knives at shows without looking like a vagrant begging for change because you have a months worth of work on the table and NEED a payday NOW. .......Steve, you can certainly identify with this analogy...back in the 70's and earlier, when someone had earned a Dan ranking in martial arts, it meant something. Now, it means your parents paid for the 18 month "Black Belt package" at the local Tae Kwon Don't "studio" and took you to class often enough to fullfill the contract. It lost it's credability and now only means "I can get my butt whipped with more style that before". So where is the benefit of acknowledging the accomplishment of earning rank in a true system ???
Good post, Bailey. It would certainly be good if we could remove "back room" politics from organizations, but as long as egos are involved and fame/popularity/prestige are at stake....that isn't going to happen. Lotta egomaniacs out there.....I think if the Knifemaker's Guild is worth belonging to in the mind of the member that is enough to make them want to belong...in the simplest terms and outlook. I personally do my martial arts because I believe in my organization....as a JSA student, the opportunity to "test" my skills has not yet presented itself.
Best Regards,
STeven Garsson