This is no attempt to flame, guys, so let's keep our heads cool. I like Busses, and I use 'em. To do crazy things, mostly. :thumbup:
I really want to see someone explain how a choil (an actual void for placing the finger) gets in the way. I understand the complaint of losing some edge, but actually getting in the way sounds kind of like user error.
No, it's not user error. And it's easy to notice, too. First, take a completely choilless knife, like, say, a basic Finnish puukko. And then take a Busse of somewhat similar size that has a choil. Now, hold the knife by the handle (note to all: the handle is the part of the knife that you're supposed to hold, being ergonomically designed for your hand - the blade on the other hand is the cutting part, which you're not supposed to hold), and make a drawing cut across nearly any even slightly soft material. Bam, with the knife that has a choil, the material will get stuck in the choil at the end of the cut, unless you're very careful not to cut that far.
But that's not the worst part. Hold the knife by the handle, and make all manner of precise cuts, perhaps try to carve a fork out of a piece of wood or anything that takes more precision than hacking and chopping. Which part of the edge is best for this? That's right, the one right next to your hand, because that allows for best balance (assuming a small to medium size knife, a large chopper will be able to benefit from a choil to move the balance to a better direction), allows you to exert the most force, and gives you the best control. Too bad that with a knife that has a choil, there's nothing right next to your hand except a huge, dull, unsharpened hole that will certainly not cut anything. With a knife that has no choil, you can do much more precise work. But hey, someone says, that's what the choil is for, to "choke up on"! But in the real world, there's absolutely no reason to need a choil to choke up on if the knife has been designed properly - that is, if there's cutting edge right next to the handle, where the best control is. But sure, let's choke up on the choil. Now there's cutting edge right next to our hand, and we get better control again. Satisfied? No, we're not. The ergonomics of the knife, when choking up on the choil, are absolutely horrifying compared to holding a blade by the handle. And to top the fun off, the choil is of course made of metal. If you guys want to do something that isn't any fun, try doing some precise work for say ten minutes in cold weather, using that choil for grip. You'll have frostbite in your choil finger in an instant, if it won't outright freeze tight to the metal and get stuck, and the ergonomics are awful to use for that long. The handle provides much better ergonomics, and best of all, the handle isn't metal (at least not in knives designed for cold weather) so your hand won't freeze.
Still think small to medium size knives should have a choil after trying that? If you do, I guess there's no more room for debate. To each man his own. Some people are just easily satisfied, or just have plain eccentric preferences.
I love choils, especially the ones the size of my index finger, and especially on a larger knife. The choil allows me to choke up on the knife.
Yeah, I agree that on a large knife (blade of 6" and longer) the choil is useful, provided that the knife is blade heavy. But on a small knife, the choil is both useless and detrimental to performance. The only reasons I can think of why smart knife makers (and Jerry is one, without a doubt) would put a choil on their small knives are making sharpening a little easier for people who really are quite careless when sharpening, and for making the knife look more "tactical."