- Joined
- May 12, 2015
- Messages
- 1,759
I find this to be quite true of fixed blades, not folders...
I have $500 folders by Al Mar that are 30 years old, made in Japan etc, the best of the time, and they are held together by pins, when a $30 Kershaw of recent vintage has full hardened screw construction throughout: The $30 Kershaw is objectively much, much better made...
Both were equally dull from the box...
As far as ergos are concerned, my Kershaw is an assisted flipper, and has close to the best ergos I've ever experienced in a folder, plus steel on steel liner locking rather than Titanium on steel.
I have a $300 SOG Fatcat, my only expensive recent vintage folder, and that is fancier and stouter, but only about even in ergonomic design with the RJ Martin designed Kershaw, just much fancier looking, and slower to deploy...
With fixed blades the differences in quality with increased price appear larger and more consistent over a larger range of prices (I find the interaction with the sheath -not putting in friction marks on the blade for instance- to be often a more complex and dodgy issue than a folder's mechanism). Folder mechanisms now seem quite generic across a wide range of prices, the SOG Fatcat being one of the rare ones to offer something different than a liner or frame lock...
Gaston
Gaston, just because you destroy your classic Al-Mar batoning that does not make your cheap Kershaws better. It still makes me and many others on this forum about sick that you did that to such a fine knife. You don't baton folders, period. Just walk away and don't say anything else on the subject.
The pin construction on those classic knives work just fine, they're lighter and capable of lasting longer than most people live provided the user knows how to use a knife like a knife and not some silly folding hatchet. There are a lot of 30 year old fixxies that weren't made for batoning as well.