You couldn't be anymore wrong. You think, and you are thinking, that people buy Bucks because that's all they can save their pennies for. You're not getting that people buy them because they are a better knife than other options. People would gladly pay twice the price for another brand if it could out do the buck choices.
I could buy knives that make your Busse and striders look like bubble gum machine knives if I wanted to. I am just too practical to be that stupid. I know no matter what, that at any price I will put any knife in its grave from using it. It takes years up to a decade. Once you've done it and see the actual difference you will learn a lesson. The only knives that will be handed down to the next generation will be whatever knife happens to be the last I buy. Knives that see use do not last a life time and if one does last a life time it wasn't used much.
That's no issue for the flavor of the week crowd and you. You won't have the same knife in your pocket next year at this time. If you did and used it everyday you'd understand why people buy Bucks.
This is what you look like the buck users replying.
Humans couldn't have built the pyramids so ALIENS!
Bucks can't be good knives because ESEE!
Your economics models have nothing to do with it either. It's all about the knife. It would be nice if you stop deflecting.
You may know others who do not consider price when buying a product. The very few I know who do not consider price are very wealthy (at least by my standards) and tend to buy luxury items. The marginal price for the increase in quality gets higher and higher as you approach the notional "best," even within the Buck product line. "Normal" people consider price, if only at a subconscious level. They have other things to do with finite funds. Makers and sellers of goods have noticed this phenomenon and do not ignore it any more than they ignore fads and fashion.
Within the normal population, some have more and others less "disposable income." Only so many knives can be justified on the basis of need vs. want. Makers and sellers of goods have also noticed this phenomenon and do not ignore it.
Buck production knives are adequate and, in part, American. They were regarded as adequate, or better, when I bought my first 110 and Duke (both in 440C - harder to sharpen but held edge longer). The value seems to me to be quite good if the knife is a tool to cut things - amazing considering the cheap price. Adjusted for inflation, they cost a fraction of what they cost decades ago. Buck cannot afford to make their production knives better at their price points - except through the Looking Glass where the price of things is irrelevant to their quality. (Of course price does not equal value in a mathematical sense, but there is a price-quality correlation. See Harbor Freight)
People pay several times the price of Buck production knives and often get clearly superior knives - like Buck customs or Spyderco. Sometimes they do not get value commensurate with price. ( Sometimes they pay half as much and get 10% the value.)
You will not convince anyone in the middle here that Buck production knives are in any realistic sense the top of quality. Not even Buck. Hence the Buck Custom Shop for those who can afford better.
No more will I be convinced, as some have argued, that Buck production knives are junk.
I have carried the same knife in my pocket for eleven years - a Vic Farmer. It is adequate for my daily needs and does not frighten the civies. But I do not fool myself that Spyderco, or Benchmade or Enzo does not make better knives. I have some of those. Indeed, I wish i could buy a Farmer that holds an edge better, like a number of other knives I own.
Personally, I cannot (well, more than a couple of times) "pull the trigger" on the $200+ knives because, for me, I to not see the results of the value equation coming out in favor of that price. I do not feel less as a result of those decisions.
"Flavor-of-the-week"? Mostly I own slip-joints in 1095. Some were made over a century ago by the best production knife companies in the world at the time. Why, even when in excellent condition, they sell for inflation-adjusted prices that are far less than what they cost when new surprises me. Fashion I guess.
I recently bought a 110 to keep my old 110 and Duke company and to compare them. While the F&F on the new 110 are remarkable for the price, I like the old ones better. The Duke seems far superior to either 110. I wish the modest use it has been put to had not resulted in blade wobble. The new 110 feels even blockier than does the old 110, the old one has better f&F,and I like the harder 440C blade. (Silly me, I enjoy sharpening.)
At the end we are all knife enthusiasts. If one hopes to convince, consider if personal attacks are a turnoff to the majority.