DEA, I don't know much about the Singaporean Army, but I'm not really that impressed with the Israeli Army. The nation of Israel is only a little over 50 years old, and it would'nt have lasted that long without the help of the USA. And already there is a movement against forced service in Israel.
MtMike, You're wrong. I made no slap at US vets prior to 1970, who the vast majority of which were NOT drafted.
It's always been true that the best warriors are those that want to be there and who want to fight.
Look at the best of the best like British SAS, US SEALs, US Special Forces, US Rangers, USMC Force Recon--these were not people who were forced to volunteer under threat of imprisonment.
You can force a person to wear the uniform but you cannot force him to be a warrior.
It's hard enough to take a civilian and turn him into a Soldier, Sailor, Airman, Marine, or Coastie. It's a long hard road to becoming a warrior, and that's when the person WANTS to be one.
Now, take a person who does'nt want to serve, a person who may even dispise and hate the military, and try to turn that person into a warrior. What you get is cannon fodder.
While combat teaches quickly, peacetime service is another story alltogether. It's not worth the time and money to train those who are almost certain to not reenlist. If you drafted a person today, during peacetime, he would only have to serve for two years.
Minus the 30 days per year of leave and you're down to 22 months of service. Minus Basic Training and you're down to about 20 months. Minus AIT and tech schools and you're down to about 18 to 12 months of service.
It costs alot of money to train a new recruit, and we should'nt waste that money of people who don't want to serve and will not reenlist.
I would support a draft 100% if the USA itself was being invaded. Every man and woman should defend their nation.
But the US military has'nt engaged another nation in combat, defending the the USA itself, since WWII.
Allen.