Tell you what... want to try a this Opinel for free?
Buck 110 and Opinel #10 by
Pinnah, on Flickr
Shoot me a visitor message with your email and I'll send it out to you. You can literally beat on it all you want and use it side by each with you Benchmade or any other folder you want.
Couple of caveats... I consider this knife entirely disposable. It was a failed experiment and I took the eo opening down way to deep and the handle now disappears in my XL gloved sized hands. If you hate the shape of the handle like I hate the handle shape, blame me, not Opinel. Also, it's a Carbone model, which has the softer (Rc56) carbon steel (close to 1086).
I honestly don't care if you break it. In fact, I would love know what it takes to bust it. All I ask is that you do the same things with your Benchmade or whatever and take pictures and report back on the comparison.
No need to spend money. Just postage back to me when your done.
Interested?
VERY tempting ... Perhaps in a month of two? My wife is expecting our 3rd child, so i have some paternity leave coming, not sure I'd have time for a proper review before then. But I'll happily do a comparison to a couple of different knives if you like.
... just as you hate the "Opinels are the best" hyperbole, I hate the "Opinels are junk" hyberbole.
Yeah, I wouldn't call them junk, but look at the title of this thread
...If you can put the knife into a padded vice, I just shove a large blade screwdriver in catching just the lip of the inner ring (not the wood, the metal) and give it a good twist to open it. Takes a few tries but no more than 5 minutes.
Sounds like what i should do then is pop off the collar lock to clean out the grit, dry it out a bit (we've had some humid weather here, and my wife may also have gotten the knife wet, though I'd treated it with mineral oil previously), re-soak the handle in oil, then re-attach the collar? I know the lock is a recent addition, but my wife doesn't trust herself with a friction-folder or slip-joint in the garden and I've stopped using such for cutting up boxes, too many accidental closures.
Slipjoints can get so fouled with sand that it's hard for me to open or close them. Lockbacks can suffer similar fates and worse, the lockbar can jam making lock up iffy.
With the Opinel, the lockring might get sticky. I've never had one jam on me, but I did a pass around last year and one guy working the trades got the ring jammed when using it with concrete mix. So, it's certainly possible. In that case, the knife becomes a friction folder. It's still useable and still safe.
I'll toss out this challenge if you give this #10 a try. Bury it and your favorite knife in dirt or sand, jump on them and then dig them out and use them. The Opinel will be useable. I'm not sure any of my lockbacks would be (Bucks, old USA Schrades mostly).
Where i live, a fine sand passes for "soil"

I'll have no trouble running the test. I too have had issue with slip-joints and lock-backs in such conditions, though the Triad-lock (Recon 1) has been more reliable with it's proper stop-pin and oversized lock-bar. Lately I've been partial to the axis-lock (benchmade) and button-lock (gerber). The only other lock-back i still have is a Spyderco Caly3 that I won't subject to such use
The #6 is crazy thin, as you've noted.
If spine thickness is the same, Opinel's convex grind is stronger than both hollow grind and flat ground. There's more steel further down towards the edge. Buck made waves in the early 2000's with their Edge 2000 profile which is a very thin ground hollow grind. Case also have a thin hollow grind. And of course SAKs have a thin flat grind. The knives I've had the worst luck with in terms of edge stability are my Case (420HC at 56 Rc) and SAKs (55Rc). I've owned a bunch of Bucks in 420HC and have stupid things like cutting metal with them and honestly, I can't tell the difference between Opinel's Inox and the Buck 420HC. Actually, I think the Opinel takes a finer edge but they last about the same for me.
I'm wondering if you're just having problems because of the small angle you used on that very thin blade.
It could be that i took it too thin at 15-dps. BTW, Buck's Edge 2000 profile was simply lowering the bevel angle from 25-DPS to 15-DPS at the edge. That's it, all, had nothing to do with hollow/convex/flat primary grind:
Most common reaction by citizens is "that's charming".
Wow, nice folk! We had a small conference here with pizza served but no plates, i took out my Wenger traveler to cut up the box-lids into plates for all, got frightened & dirty looks and a bunch of, "Why do you have a weapon at work?!" sheesh. One guy thanked me for the plates.
I'm not seeing how "cheap" has anything to do with this. Plenty of very expensive knives out there that don't have pocket clips
Not like that, a clip is an added cost in materials and construction, un-clipped is cheaper to make, that's all. I've seen folk add clips to SAKs and Opinels - it's added cost/time/effort, makes the knife more expensive.
I've found that hard cutting of brush and wood loosens lockbacks up over time. This is regardless of brand that I've tried. I've also found that peened and finished pivots can loosen up laterally. Less of a problem perhaps with modern screwed joints.
Yup, no blade-stop-pin and peened vs bolted. I haven't used the #6 hard enough to cause any such damage.
I find the convexed Opinels to go through wood much better than either. Hollow grinds bind at the shoulder of the grind and flat grinds simply bind period. For me.
In my experience, thinner blades bind in wood, regardless of bevel profile. My chisels are mostly flat-grind and never bind (being so stout)
Hard to see how a FFG or HG of similar thickness would put more steel behind the edge.
Simple, different primary bevel angle. I did a review comparing some small knives a bit back, including one by Tim Johnson that is ~1/8" at the spine and ~0.005" behind the edge, 1" wide. Compare that to an ESEE Izula ~1/8" at the spine and 0.030" behind the edge. Obvious once you think about it, right?
Anyway, if you find this post buried in this thread, I am interested in doing the test, but not just now. Thank you for the offer. :thumbup: