Dear All--including the wise-guys who think they're clever and then end up doing things like writing "H/W" instead of "W/H" or need pictures because they can't interpret the written word or wonder why someone like me would want to move from one area of highly paid public health service (dental surgeon) to a very under-paid and life-threatening area of public-safety service (police officer) simply because it felt like the right thing to do,
After the initial correspondence appeared on this site, I was contacted by a most, most helpful gentleman at W/H who first offered the suggestion that I was probably expecting more of the knife (appearance-wise) than could reasonably be expected from a hand-made or semi-hand-made knife, and that I ought to return the knife to W/H so that they could at least tighten the blade pivot so that the knife would no longer fall under the "prohibited weapons" laws of the State of Texas (gravity/centrifugal-force knife). Through a series of e-mails, the two of us quickly got to the point of my being offered--with no essence of bitterness or resentment either stated or implied by the W/H representative--the choice of returning the knife for a full refund, repairs to the blade pivot (other than regrinding the flaws in the already DLC-coated blade) and the irregularly finished black palm inlay, and/or whatever I thought would be fair. I said that I really did like that knife and would like to keep it, but that the problems with the blade's finish (It also had a dull point, almost as if it had been dropped.) made that more than I could bear after having paid $833 (including tax and dealer mark-up) for the thing. I asked if there might be another in the series of that particular issue available for a trade, or if I could trade down to a similar knife (no wood inlay, but still the blue sapphires that I like in the original). I also pointed out that the photos on the W/H website of the knife model that I had bought showed a perfect semi-hand-made knife, so surely there must be at least one of them out there--if the series hadn't been totally sold out already. I was told that a new knife would be on its way to me immediately.
The replacement has as close-to-perfectly-ground a blade as I've seen on any of my non-factory knives, the black palm inlay is now uniformly finished with the seams between titanium frame and inlay barely perceptible instead of feeling like large steps, the pivot is tight enough to no longer allow centrifugal opening but to make thumbing the blade a very simple task (no over-tightening, in other words), and I was even given a new presentation box with the new knife, though I have offered to return the second box and am awaiting a reply on that one, not wanting to be or appear to be someone who tries to get something for nothing.
I am totally satisfied with the solution offered by William Henry, I now have four W/H knives that are as well made as anything I could hope for, this knife will be a near-daily carry knife for use whenever I am dressed in light-fabric clothes (dress occasions or bodyguard assignments) because of its excellent weight-to-function ratio, and now I don't have to defend the numerous irregularities of the original knife to the friends and fellow officers who saw the first knife and wondered what had happened to William Henry quality.
If this is too many words for any of you to absorb, I suggest you try video games--lots of "pictures," and either no words or hardly any. (That was a snide remark, in case you missed it.) If you would prefer photos (This, however, is not meant to be snide.), simply picture the first knife as having a dull, unpolished area on one handle inlay that was about 8mm in diameter; and a blade that looked like it had been dropped onto its point from high enough in the air for the impact to have crumpled the first 3/8" behind the tip (though only on one side, the other being perfectly flat), and that had two or three 1/4"-wide wavy areas on both sides of the blade where the hollow-ground portion should have been uniformly concave.
Again, to be sure that I have gotten this much across, the W/H representative--who contacted me after my comments were posted on this site--was of a totally different mind-set than the first person I'd contacted at W/H, all e-mail correspondence was polite, open, and honest; I have a replacement knife of the same model as the original that is of excellent quality and which is completely satisfactory, and I'm waiting to hear whether or not the W/H people would like the duplicate wooden presentation box returned or if they're comping it because of the problems I had with the first knife. I owed it to the W/H people to let all of you readers know to what lengths the company had gone in order to maintain their reputation for both high-quality knives and complete customer satisfaction.
Forgot: Yes, it was entirely my fault for not having my reading glasses with me when I picked up the first knife at the store that sold it to me (I'm withholding the name out of courtesy. Let's just say that they're a brand-name store that sells very, very high-end shotguns and handguns manufactured by the longest-operating manufacturing entity in the world, as well as a clothing and accessory line, and items such as William Henry knives.). I was trusting the knife to be as well-made as its three predecessors in my collection, but that was dumb and naive of me. I take complete responsibility for that gaff.