I like both basic shapes. 1 is more of a utility camp/kitchen knife and 2 is more of an EDC/hunter.
There are two major areas I think you need changes in:
First thing that the eye sees is that funny crook in the spine near the tip.....get rid of that. It serves no function, and is hard on the eyes. Make the spine curve to the tip evenly.
Second thing that the eye sees is the huge notch in the blade edge and a funny tit behind it. If you put the notch there for sharpening ease ( that is what they are for), then it only needs to be a small semicircle. 1/16" radius ( 1/8" wide) is plenty. The un-ground metal behind it needs to be at the height of the top of the notch, or higher. If it is on the same plane as the edge, it will interfere with sharpening the edge, and the back portion won't be properly sharpened. You will then try to sharpen the back as a separate area, and dish it out. The same problem arrears when a plunge is used on a slicer type blade. The thicker metal at the plunge interferes with the sharpening. I don't use plunges whenever I can get away from them. The perfect plunge, IMHO, is one that defines the ricasso, and runs right off the blade at the heel. This creates an edge to the heel, and a nice sharp plunge line at the ricasso.
Here is what I would do with your drawings:
1) On both, make the spine an even curve to the tip.
2) On both, make the radial curve from the bottom of the handle ( index finger rest) to the edge a more rounded curve ( like #1). Have the curve end at the current junction of the plunge and the Spanish notch. You can leave the notch the same size as drawn if you do this. This completely removes the tit behind the notch, but keeps a little area of unsharpened material ( the notch surface) to make the heel more finger friendly.
Try drawing those changes, and I think you will greatly like the improved look and feel.
ok, I'll work on these next thanks




