The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
I had an Emerson CQC-7 and a Benchmade CQC-7.
The Benchmade was by far the superior piece. Wish I had it back.
If you want a CQC-7, see if you can find an old Benchmade 970 or 975.
That's my advice.
I'd have to disagree with you on this - the construction of the 970/975 was not as good as Emerson's construction of the CQC 7. The 970/975 series knives had a single screw running through one untapped liner on the presentation side into the tapped liner on the lock side. Because of this, not only was the locking mechanism more sensitive to changes in tightness of the handle & clip screws, but the threads of both the screws and the locking liner were more prone to stripping. I say this as someone who has collected several 970/975 models in the past and at one point owned eight of them, including prototypes and the titanium blade version. I have also owned three Emerson CQC-7s produced in 1999.
Your experience is yours, and mine is mine. Hence your opinion is yours and mine is mine.
You certainly have a larger data set of pieces to form your experience, but it does not nullify mine.
Different strokes and such.... you set those two knives in front of me and I'll buy the Benchmade version every time.
My best advice is know your purpose and the purpose of the makers knives. If they match, get one. If not, move on to something else.
I like Emerson knives for what they intended. I'm also a big Ernie fan just for being a solid dude and a maker that appreciates his customers/vendors/etc. Ernie makes knives for a specific function....fighting, durability and efficiency. Some of the best ergos on folding knives. If you are getting one to win a beauty context (fit/finish), you aren't going to win. That being said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I find most Emerson designs to have fantastic lines. If finish is a major factor in your checklist, I'd recommend skipping. If you want a hardcore protection/self defense blade, get one. They do take break-in to get butter smooth. They aren't lightweight carry EDCs, they aren't bushcrafting folders.. they are defensive knives, but can also open boxes and cut off wrist bands. If that is what you want, I think you will be happy. But just like any knife, don't set you expectations to such a high level that even perfection won't fill the void. This can be said for any knife. Understand what you are buying and think if it will fit into your lifestyle.
My advice, get one and decide for yourself. Best of luck brother!
The only problem with that, Hawk45, is that Emersons are NOT built any differently from any other titanium liner, G10, 154CM knife. The kind you can buy all day every day for $50.
When you get into the $200 price bracket, you're up against lots of knives that are better built, made of better materials, and have better fit & finish.
So, I don't buy the whole "fit & finish is for pansies ... these knives are built for real men" argument. It's not like sloppy tolerances somehow make a knife "tougher." A knife can be both tough and well built; you don't have to choose one or the other.
I like Emersons, mostly because I like the designs and respect the innovations he made 20 years ago. I own a few. They have a special place in tactical knife history. As for the price...we're all crazy by the standards of normal people. Emersons cost 1/2 to 1/3 of folders I do carry everyday, so I don't find them extravagantly priced. Just not great value for money in 2017. How about some S35VN, Elmax, micarta, titanium bolsters, or something?
So, I don't buy the whole "fit & finish is for pansies ... these knives are built for real men" argument. It's not like sloppy tolerances somehow make a knife "tougher." A knife can be both tough and well built; you don't have to choose one or the other.
