I gotta agree with you kneedeep. All topspec was saying is that if the knife wasn't automatic then he could have one. I thought the same thing. Kershaw doesn't mind when people have negative comments about them, as long as they are proffered in a respectful way, which is what topspec did. He wasn't bashing Kershaw, just lamenting the fact that because it is an automatic, a lot of people (myself included) won't get to own this knife. I think EVERYONE agrees that the knife is awesome and Tim Galyean needs to keep making knives for Kershaw!
safe to say that you cant even own one, let alone carry, while a Texas resident? (there was a big article about it not to long ago, i dont remember what it said)
OK, so i finally took the time to read through all of this and I have come to a couple of opinions.
First, topspec, i understand that it sucks to not be able to get the new ZT autos because they are autos. considering where you live, well, that speaks for itself. but to ask why they "have" to be autos, i couldnt agree with mike more. besides, there are other models out there that have somewhat the same lines that would be easier to explain in the UK. naimly the 0200, which was mentioned, and the 0400 because of the blade shape. so long as that torsion bar is gone of course. simple fix.
stating what you did about the new ZT autos shows a bit of ignorance towards the reason they were made, which is for LEOs and military. that simple. the 0200 and the rest of the non-auto line are really for LEO and military, but are not going to be relegated because of the automatic knife laws (though there are loopholes to everything, sadly the UK hates everything with a point to it). the example of New Graham requiring a LEO or military ID sums up my point. not to hard to understand. again you point is valid, but does come off as a touch ignorant.
second, vassili. like cutter said, there have been alot of good and great posts from you in the past, that i too have enjoyed reading. however the remarks about the history of the "tanto" and the Cold Steel comments are just stupid. as others, and i think its mainly cutter, have said, no one cares about the history of it. if they are a Japanese history buff, then sure, they can care. If Kershaw was marketing it as a "true Japanese tanto" then, yes, it could be a problem for some. However, like most people, I am NOT a Japanese history buff (though i do find it interesting history), and thus dont care. Also, Kershaw is not marketing the knife as a "true Japanese tanto", thus why should it matter? I cant see a LEO getting one of these and refusing to use it because it "isnt true to the word 'tanto'". My main concern, along with most users, is
"will the knife suit my needs? I dont want to buy it if it isnt going to fit my needs.".Thats what i ask, not "
what is the history of this blade shape? is it true to its history? i dont want to buy it if it isnt true to its history!"Do us a favor vassili, and actually answer Tim's question:
"what would you call the blade?", only without the history lesson. "fake" does not count btw
vassili, if you dont like what i had to say as my opinion, then PM me and we will talk that way. the above is exactly that, an OPINION.
back to your reguarly scheduled thread