- Joined
- May 14, 2011
- Messages
- 2,772
I voted for ironwood for the following reasons.
Elk is very nice... as long as it is not "saddle shaped", "too thick or fat", "chalky looking" or "just plain ugly"! Let's face it, elk stag is quite subjective when it comes to individual taste, runs the entire range of what I just described, and may be an issue shipping to some countries due to import/export laws. I fear elk will spawn a bunch of "less than desireable" forum knives, and ironwood is a better choice for those reasons. Of course, some ironwood is prettier than other plainer pieces of the same wood, but at least the size and shape (and therefore pocketability) are consistent.
Mt.Pokt showed a nice example of elk stag on his 303, but I ordered two of these and while one was fine, the other was really chalky looking and severely saddle shaped. I sold it because it was not acceptable to me at all.
CHANGE YOUR VOTES TO IRONWOOD to avoid unacceptable elk stag covers, or take your chances of getting an ugly/skinny/fat/saddle shaped or chalky example.
Elk is very nice... as long as it is not "saddle shaped", "too thick or fat", "chalky looking" or "just plain ugly"! Let's face it, elk stag is quite subjective when it comes to individual taste, runs the entire range of what I just described, and may be an issue shipping to some countries due to import/export laws. I fear elk will spawn a bunch of "less than desireable" forum knives, and ironwood is a better choice for those reasons. Of course, some ironwood is prettier than other plainer pieces of the same wood, but at least the size and shape (and therefore pocketability) are consistent.
Mt.Pokt showed a nice example of elk stag on his 303, but I ordered two of these and while one was fine, the other was really chalky looking and severely saddle shaped. I sold it because it was not acceptable to me at all.
CHANGE YOUR VOTES TO IRONWOOD to avoid unacceptable elk stag covers, or take your chances of getting an ugly/skinny/fat/saddle shaped or chalky example.