Goddman man, you took off an insane amount of INFI off by hand, i don't envy the effort that took. Also, condolences on your unfortunate loss and subsequent lesson. I made a few attempts with a DMT aligner and realized i wanted nothing to do with aligner systems.
There have been several posts discussing the issues caused by pivot/aligner based sharpening systems. A lot of things can effect the actual angle of the "regrind" in this case, including the length of the knife and the location of the clamp, and if the blade is set perfectly perpendicular to the base of the unit, and the curve of the belly and tip of the blade. There is also geometry of arc's involved that I'm not smart enough to explain/fully understand. You are basically sharpening a strait edge with an arc, and further the edge extends beyond the nominal (measured/gauged) radius of the arc, the more acute the resulting angle.
I'm not defending anyone here, but if he removed as much metal as i think he did, that could qualify as a "major modification."
The question is whether re-profiling should be considered a "major modification," but maybe the question should be, "how much metal did you remove?" I think this is more relevant at the end of the day than the manner in which you removed that metal (assuming you didn't heat the steel and ruin the temper), or the original intention.
I just got a BubbleJig and this thing is amazing. Its a bubble level on a magnet with a pivot. once you attach the magnet to the side of the blade, you set the blade to the angle you want, lock down the pivot, and you are good to go. Since its always parallel to the blade it shouldn't suffer from the issues of pivot-point, arc, blade length, etc. He sells it for grinding, but my playing around with it has shown very promising results on bench stones.
sorry for your loss...